是语文实践,语言实践,还是言语实践?

The Course of Language Involves Chinese Practice, Language Practice, or Speech Practice?

语文是综合性与实践性课程,新颁布的《普通高中语文课程标准(2017年版)》对语文课程实践的表述出现了"语文实践""语言实践"以及与言语活动、言语经验相关的"言语实践"三种概念命名。形式逻辑视域的概念分析注重了语文课程实践的结构、构成要素及基本功能,却难以反映该概念构成要素与要素的矛盾运动特性。从语文教学的语境出发,根据辩证逻辑的认识,言语实践是语文课程实践的本体,是一种语境性的言意多重转换活动,是一种主体间性的对话交流活动,是一种诗意生成性的综合活动。

Language is a comprehensive and practical course. The newly-issued "2017 Edition of Standards for High School Chinese Curriculum" describes the practice of the course of Chinese Language as the concepts of Chinese practice, language practice and speech practice related to verbal activities and experience. The conceptual analysis of the formal logic focuses on the practical structure, components and basic functions of the Chinese curriculum, but fails to reflect the contradictory characteristics of these concepts and relevant elements. This study argues that the ontology of the Chinese language practice is a multiple contextual conversion of speech and meaning, inter-subjective dialogue, and an integral activity of poetic generation, from the perspective of contextual Chinese teaching and dialectical logic.