我国诉讼中专家辅助人的立场研究——以网络知识产权诉讼为核心

Research on Position of Experts' Assistants in China's Litigations——Focusing on Network Intellectual Property Litigations

社会分工不断细化,使社会生活各领域专业化程度越来越高,诉讼活动也呈现此种趋势。法官有时会对专业性强的案件难以审理,网络知识产权诉讼尤其突出,其既有专业性呈现出新特征、面临着新困境。因此,专家辅助人的引入对网络知识产权诉讼日益重要,同时专家辅助人的"倾向性"与"中立性"立场更是值得关注。在比较分析与借鉴两大法系的相关制度基础上,可以明确和促进我国网络知识产权诉讼中专家辅助人立场定位的平衡与保障,具体包括:构建涵盖不同领域专家的专家库,完善专家辅助人的权利、义务与责任体系等。

As the social division of labor continues to refine, so does the degree of specialization in all areas of social life. Litigation activities also show this trend. Judges sometimes find it difficult to hear cases that are highly specialized, which is particularly prominent in intellectual property lawsuits. In the context of the Internet, the existing professionalism of intellectual property litigation presents new features and faces new difficulties. Therefore, the introduction of expert assistants is increasingly important for cyber intellectual property lawsuits, and the "propensity" and "neutrality" stance of expert assistants deserves more attention. O n the basis of comparative analysis and reference to the relevant systems of the two major legal systems, the position balance and safeguard measures of expert assistants in China's network intellectual property litigation m a y include: building an expert database covering experts in different fields, and improving the rights and obligations of expert helpers. With responsibility system and so on.