不同家庭类型的急性心血管事件后患者希望水平比较

Comparison of hope among acute cardiovascular events patients with different family types

目的比较不同家庭类型的急性心血管事件后患者希望水平。方法采用便利抽样法,选取2015 年12 月-2016 年12 月在郑州大学第一附属医院心内科门诊随诊的经受急性心血管事件的患者110例为研究对象。采用中文版家庭亲密度和适应性量表(FACESⅡ-CV)、中文版Herth希望指数(Herth Hope Index,HHI)对其进行调查,比较不同家庭类型患者的希望水平。结果根据中文版FACES Ⅱ-CV 调查结果,将研究对象分为家庭平衡型30 例、中间型32 例及极端型48 例。不同家庭类型的急性心血管事件后患者希望水平差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论急性心血管事件后极端型家庭患者希望水平高于中间型和平衡型,护理工作者应引导急性心血管事件后家庭类型向极端型转化,以提高希望水平,促进患者康复。

Objective To explore the hope among acute cardiovascular events( ACE) patients with different family types. Methods From December 2015 to December 2016, we selected 110 outpatients underwent ACE of Department of Cardiovascular Medicine in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University as subjects by convenience sampling. All of the patients were investigated with the Chinese Version of Family Cohesion and Adaptability Scale( FACESⅡ-CV) and Herth Hope Index( HHI) to compare hope among patients with different family types. Results Subjects were divided into the balance type family( 30 cases), the intermedius type( 32 cases) and the extreme type( 48 cases) according to the survey findings of FACESⅡ-CV. There were statistical differences in hope among ACE patients with different family types( P < 0.01). Conclusions After ACE,hope of patients of the extreme type family is higher than that of intermedius type and balance type. Nursing workers should guide family types after ACE to transform into extreme type so as to improve hope and promote recovery of patients.