期刊文献+

用两种阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果对比

Comparison of two kinds of appendectomy for acute appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较用腹腔镜下阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。方法 :将2015年2月至2018年8月期间天长市人民医院收治的90例急性阑尾炎患者平均分为研究组和对照组。对研究组患者进行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,对对照组患者进行开腹阑尾切除术。然后比较两组患者手术的效果。结果:研究组患者手术的时间长于对照组患者(P <0.05),其术中的出血量少于对照组患者(P <0.05),其术毕至排气的时间、术毕至进食的时间及住院的时间均短于对照组患者(P <0.05),其术后并发症的发生率低于对照组患者(P <0.05)。结论 :与用开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果相比,用腹腔镜下阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果较为理想。 objective:to compare the effects of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis.Methods:90 patients with acute appendicitis admitted to tianchang people’s hospital from February 2015 to August 2018 were divided into an average study group and a control group.Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in the study group and open appendectomy was performed in the control group.The results of the two groups were then compared.Results:the group patient surgery time is longer than the control group(P<0.05),patients with perioperative blood loss less than in the control group(P<0.05),the time and never put off till tomorrow what you can to vent to the finish to the eating time and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group patients(P<0.05),the incidence of postoperative complications is lower than the control group patients(P<0.05).Conclusion:compared with the effect of open appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis,the effect of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis is ideal.
作者 徐全宏 Xu Quanhong(department 2,people’s hospital of tianchang,anhui province,tianchang Anhui 239300)
出处 《当代医药论丛》 2019年第4期15-17,共3页
关键词 急性阑尾炎 腹腔镜下阑尾切除术 传统开腹阑尾切除术 acute appendicitis Laparoscopic appendectomy Traditional open appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1吴卫国,吴雪晴.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎临床疗效对比[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(8):496-496. 被引量:7
  • 2Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Endoscopy, 1983, 15 (2) : 59 -64.
  • 3Heikkineo TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost - effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study [ J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12 (10): 1204-1208.
  • 4Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J]. South Med J, 1996, 89 (7): 668-674.
  • 5Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventionsversionS. 1. 0 (updated March 2011) [M/OL]. http : //www. cochrane - handbook. org/.
  • 6Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1994, 219 (6): 725-728.
  • 7Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [ J ]. World J Surg, 1996, 20 (3): 263-266.
  • 8Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopie versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial [ J]. World J Surg,1996, 20 (1): 17-20.
  • 9Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients [ J]. Can J Surg, 1996, 39 (6): 457-462.
  • 10Sezeur A, Bure - Rossier AM, Rio D, et al. Does laparascopy increase the bacteriological risk of appendectomy? Results of a randomized prospective study [J]. Ann Chir, 1997, 51 (3) : 243 -247.

共引文献341

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部