期刊文献+

从交往共同体到法律共同体——哈贝马斯对现代西方国家的演进式重构 被引量:7

From Communicative Community to Legal Community: Habermas's Evolutionary Reconstruction of Modern Western Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为西方社会批判理论的代表人物,哈贝马斯对现代西方国家的重构,是建立在其对西方现存国家批判基础之上的。这种批判也经历了从晚期资本主义的危机到生活世界的殖民化的嬗变。哈贝马斯认为法律是挽救现代资本主义的现代性、将生活世界从系统的殖民中解放出来的媒介。这种法律不是现存国家的实证法,而是建立在哈贝马斯重构的法律共同体基础上的法律。虽然法律共同体是现代西方国家的最佳的重构方案,但哈贝马斯的探索也经历了一个从交往共同体到法律共同体的过程。这种法律,是以交往为形式,以商谈为原则,通过对现代西方国家中实用、伦理、道德问题的论辩而产生的。在这一系列商谈过程中,现代西方国家也成为自由而平等公民联合起来的法律共同体。虽然哈贝马斯是基于现代西方国家来构建其法律共同体的,但对当下中国也具有一定的借鉴意义。 As a representative figure of the Critical Theory of Western society, Habermas has reconstructed the modern Western countries based on his criticism. This criticism has also experienced the transformation from the crisis of late capitalism to the colonization of life world. Habermas believes that law is the medium to save the modernity of modern capitalism and liberate the life world from systematic colonization. This law is not a positive law of the existing country, but a law based on the legal community reconstructed by Habermas. Although the legal community is the best reconstruction plan for modern Western countries, Habermas’s exploration is not an overnight process, but it has gone through a process from a communicative community to a legal community. This kind of law based on communication and is produced through practical, ethical, moral, and legal discourses. In this series of discourses, modern Western countries have also become a legal community united by free and equal citizens. Although Habermas’s legal community is built based on modern western countries, it still has certain reference significance for China today.
作者 严宏 YAN Hong(Anhui Normal University)
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期56-62,共7页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"依法治国与以德治国的关系研究"(14AZD135)的阶段性成果
关键词 哈贝马斯 生活世界殖民化 交往共同体 商谈 法律共同体 Habermas the colonization of life world communicative community discourse legal community
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Jurgen Habermas,Legtimation Crisis,tran.Tomas McCarthyBoston:Beacon Press,1975,herafterLC;Idem, The Thheory of Comunicative Action,2 vols,trans.Tomas McCarthy,Boston:Beacon Press,1984-87,hereafter TCA;Idem,Between Facts and Norms,trans.William Rehg (Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,forthcoming),hereafter BFN.All page references to BFN are to the Game edition,Faktizitat,und Geltung (Frankfurt:suhrkamp Verlag,1992).
  • 2Talcott Parsons and Nell J.Smelser,Economy and Society, London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1957,pp. 14-19.
  • 3Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Scoial Action, 2 vols.New York: Free Press, 1965.
  • 4Jon Elster, The Cement of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 5Parsons and Smelser, Economy and Society.
  • 6Talcott Parsons, On the Concept of Political Power, Sociological Theory and Modern Society, New York:The Free Press,1967,p. 363.
  • 7Habermas is intentionally modifying this terminology, adopted from David Lockwood,Social Integration and System Integration,in G.Zollschan and W.Hirsch, ends.Explorations in Social Change, Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1964.
  • 8A crisis theory of this latter type has been eloborated more fully by Daniel Bell, The Cultural Contrdictons of Capitalism,New York:Basic Books,1975.
  • 9Max Weber,Economy and society,2 vols.,eds.Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, Berkley:University of California Press,1978.
  • 10Georg Lukacs,History and Class Consciousness, trans.Rodney Livingstone, Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1971.

共引文献4

同被引文献43

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部