期刊文献+

采用三维数据分析拍摄角度对保乳手术美容效果评价的影响

Effect of camera angle on cosmetic assessment of breast conservative surgery with three dimensional data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用三维(3D)激光扫描数据研究使用基于二维(2D)图片的乳腺癌保乳手术美容效果客观评价方法时,拍摄图片的角度对评价结果一致性的影响。方法获取两种不同图源的2D图片:采用索尼数码单反相机α77拍摄获得接受保乳手术治疗的30位患者乳房区域的2D数码正面照片;同时使用激光扫描仪获取患者乳房的完整3D几何模型和表面纹理,并对沿身体中线旋转后的3D模型进行屏幕截图,生成不同视角的2D图片来模拟不同的拍摄角度。邀请3位专家依据Harris主观标准对两种图源的正面照片进行美容效果评价;并采用客观评价方法来评价所有2D图片;分析拍摄角度对总体客观评价结果及乳房对称性、颜色和瘢痕三个客观评价指标测量值的影响。结果两种图源的2D图片对主观评价结果的影响差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。使用客观评价方法依次评价两种图源的2D图片,也显示出图源对评价的影响差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05);采用客观评价方法进行美容效果评价,结果表明不同旋转角度对总体评价结果有明显的影响(P<0. 05),同时乳房对称性、颜色和瘢痕三个特征指标的测量值随拍摄角度的变化发生明显的改变(P<0. 05)。结论基于2D图片的评价易受拍摄角度的影响,基于3D数据的评价可给出更为客观的评价结果 ,具有很好的应用前景。 Objective To investigate the effect of camera angles on consistency of two-dimension (2D) picture-based objective evaluation for cosmetic outcome of breast conservative surgery (BCT) with three-dimensional (3D) scanning data. Methods The face-view digital photographs were taken from 30 patients treated with BCT and their 3D digital breast models with high quality color textures were acquired using a 3D laser scanner.The 2D snapshots of 3D models were obtained after rotation along the midline of the body ranging from -10° to 10° to stimulate different camera angles.The cosmetic outcome was assessed on both face-view photographs and 2D snapshots,subjectively and objectively.The subjective assessment was performed by three experts using the Harris scale (a subjective method) on face-view photographs,while the objective assessment was undertaken on both face-view photographs and 2D snapshots with BCCT.core,a representative 2D-picture based multi-features objective method and software tool.The effects of camera angles on the overall cosmetic assessment and the measurements of indices to for assessing the features of breast symmetry,color and scar visibility were also investigated. Results There was no significant difference in subjective assessment result when two different types of 2D face-view pictures (2D snapshot and 2D picture) from the same patient were used for subjective assessment by three experts ( P >0.05);there was also no significant difference in objective assessment result when BCCT.core was used to assess the two types of 2D face-view pictures ( P >0.05).The objective assessment on 2D snapshots showed that the rotation angle did affect both the overall cosmetic assessment result and the measurements indices for assessing the breast features ( P <0.05). Conclusion The 2D-picture based cosmetic evaluation is susceptible to camera angle,and more consistent objective evaluation results can be achieved with 3D scanning data.3D scanning data has a great potential to be used for more consistent and objective assessment of cosmetic outcomes in patients after breast conservative surgery.
作者 董爱萍 杨沁惠 房林 胡家树 韩宝三 韩良浩 DONG Ai-ping;YANG Qin-hui;FANG Lin;HU Jia-shu;HAN Bao-san;HAN Liang-hao(Center for Translational Medicine,East Hospital,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Lanzhou City,Lanzhou 730030,China;Dep.of Thyroid and Breast Surgery,Tenth People's Hospital,Tongji University,Shanghai 200072,China;Dep.of General Surgery,XinhuaHospital,School of Medicine,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200092,China)
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2019年第2期218-224,共7页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
基金 上海市科学技术委员会浦江人才计划项目(16PJ1409400)
关键词 乳腺癌 美容效果 客观评价方法 图片 三维数据 breast cancer cosmetic result objective evaluation method picture three-dimension scanning data
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献62

  • 1Bedwinek J. Treatment of stage I and Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the breast by tumor excision and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1981,7: 1553-1559.
  • 2Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol,2000, 18: 1668-1675.
  • 3Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer, 1995,76:259-267.
  • 4Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P, et al. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med,2001,345:1378-1387.
  • 5National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA,1991,265:391-395.
  • 6Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med,2002,347: 1233-1241.
  • 7Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Bergh J, et al. 10-Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol,1999,17:2326-2333.
  • 8Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, et al. The importance of resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol,1996,22:17-22.
  • 9Clark RM, Whelan T, Levine M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and axillary dissection for node-negative breast cancer: an update. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst,1996,88:1659-1664.
  • 10Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, et al. Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group. Lancet,1996,348:708-713.

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部