期刊文献+

Quadrant微创通道与常规后路开放椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的疗效 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Quadrant微创通道与常规后路开放椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的疗效。方法纳入2013-06~2016-06,于我院骨科治疗的84例无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折患者,将采用Quadrant微创通道下椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗的38例设为观察组,常规后路开放椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗的46例设为对照组。比较两组患者手术时间、住院时间等指标,记录两组术后7 d、6个月、2年的Cobb角、ODI评分、VAS评分,并统计并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后VAS评分均显著降低,且术后7 d观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后6个月、2年差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后ODI评分、Cobb角均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后7d观察组ODI评分显著低于对照组,术后6月、2年差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后Cobb角差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组切口感染率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组均无内固定松动等严重并发症出现。结论无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折采用Quadrant微创通道下椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗,能获得与常规后路开放椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗一致的近期疗效,但Quadrant微创通道手术创伤更小,术后短期疼痛症状缓解效果更优。
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2019年第2期270-272,共3页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1李广宇.疼痛程度评估:视觉模拟评分法[N].医药经济报,2011-08-22.
  • 2Defino HL, Canto FR. Low thoracic and lumbar burst fractures: radiographic and functional outcomes [J]. Eur Spine J,2007,16(11) :1934-1943.
  • 3Gelb D, Ludwing S, Karp JE, et al. Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle in- strumentation[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010,23 (5) : 293-301.
  • 4Verlaan J J, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treat- ment fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine:a systemic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and out- come[J]. Spine,2004(29) 803-814.
  • 5Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifi- dus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation [J]. Spine,2005 (30) :123-129.
  • 6Wild MH, Cless M, Plieschnegger C, et al. Five-year fol- low-up examination after purely minimally invasive poste- rior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures:a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conxentionally open treated patients [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007,127(5) :335-343.
  • 7Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB,Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolater al lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies [J]. J Spine Disord Tech, 2006,19 (2) : 77-86.
  • 8Kirkald-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, et al. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis [ J ] .Spine, 1978,3 (4) :319-328.
  • 9Majani G,Tiengo M, Giardini A,et al. Relatiqnship between MPQ and VAS in 962 patients. A rationale for their use. [J].Minerva Anestesiol, 2003,69 ( 1-2 ) : 67-73.
  • 10Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB:The Oswestry Disability Index [ J] .Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2000,25(22) :2940-2952.

共引文献50

同被引文献72

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部