期刊文献+

经阴道拖出切除标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的临床体会

Clinical study of laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal radical resection for rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解经阴道拖出切除标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的安全性及可行性。方法选取28例直肠癌患者,13例(A组)接受经阴道拖出切除标本的腹腔镜下根治术治疗,15例(B组)接受传统腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术治疗。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血、术后住院时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、术后并发症发生情况及短期肿瘤结局。结果A组的手术时间长于B组(P<0.05),胃肠功能恢复和住院时间均短于B组(P<0.01),术后并发症及短期肿瘤结局与B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与传统腹腔镜直肠癌根治术相比,经阴道拖出切除标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术操作相对困难,耗时较长,但能缩短术后恢复时间,避免腹部切口,达到美容效果,安全可行。 Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic- assisted transvaginal radical resection for rectal cancer.Methods Twenty-eight patients with rectal cancer were divided into two groups.Group A (13 cases) received laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal radical resection while Group B (15 cases) received conventional laparoscopic radical resection.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospital stay,gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative complications and short-term tumor outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results Group A had the operation time longer than Group B (P<0.05),and had the gastrointestinal function recovery time and postoperative hospital stay shorter than Group B (P<0.01).There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications and short-term tumor outcomes.Conclusion Although laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal radical resection is more difficult and takes longer time compared with conventional laparoscopic radical resection,it can shorten postoperative recovery time,avoid abdominal incision and achieve excellent cosmetic results.It is a safe and feasible option.
作者 范琳峰 刘丽芳 谢雨林 赵书锋 刘志坚 盛瑶环 曾祥福 FAN Lin-feng;LIU Li-fang;XIE Yu-lin;ZHAO Shu-feng;LIU Zhi-jian;SHENG Yao-huan;ZENG Xiang-fu(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University,Ganzhou 341000,China;Gannan Medical University,Ganzhou 341000,China)
出处 《广东医科大学学报》 2019年第2期198-201,共4页 Journal of Guangdong Medical University
关键词 经阴道 腹腔镜 直肠癌根治术 transvaginal laparoscopy radical resection of rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献48

  • 1Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL, et al. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of the American Society of colon and rectal surgeons laparoscopic regisistry [ J ]. Dis Colon Return 1996,39 ( Suppl ) : 20-23.
  • 2Decarli LA, Zorron R, Branco A, Lima FC, Tang M, Pioneer SR, Sanseverino JI, Menguer R, Bigolin AV, Gagner M. New hybrid approach for NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical experience. Surg Innov 2009; 16:181-186.
  • 3Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V, Atas Y, Fritze F, Burghardt J, Elling D, Gellert K. Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2444-2452.
  • 4Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H, Quispe R, Ramirez E, Grande J, Tamayo J, Sanchez V, Malaga D, Marks JM. Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:1092-1098.
  • 5Sotelo R, de Andrade R, Fernandez G, Ramirez D, Di Grazia E Carmona O, Moreira O, Berger A, Aron M, Desai MM, Gill IS. NOTES hybrid transvaginal radical nephrectomy for tumor: stepwise progression toward a first successful clinical case. Eur Urol2010; 57:138-144.
  • 6Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Biasing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ. The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 2010; 252:263-270.
  • 7Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, DeCarli L, Henrique Sousa L, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Branco AJ, Balashanmugan TS, Boza C, Corcione F, D' Avila Avila F, Arturo Gomez N, Galvao Ribeiro PA, Martins S, Filgueiras M, Gellert K, Wood Branco A, Kondo W, Inaeio Sanseverino J, de Sousa JA, Saavedra L, Ramirez E, Campos J, Sivakumar K, Rajan PS, Jategaonkar PA, Ranagrajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M, Cuccurullo D, Muller V. International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery--NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 2010; 17:142-158.
  • 8Nau P, Anderson J, Happel L, Yuh B, Narula VK, Needleman B, Ellison EC, Melvin WS, Hazey JW. Safe alternative transgastric peritoneal access in humans: NOTES. Surgery 2011; 149:147-152.
  • 9Nau P, Anderson J, Yuh B, Muscarella P Jr, Christopher El- lison E, Happel L, Narula VK, Melvin WS, Hazey JW. Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy: extension of the initial human trial for staging of pancreatic head masses. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:1440-1446.
  • 10Nikfarjam M, McGee MF, Trunzo JA, Onders RP, Pearl JP, Poulose BK, Chak A, Ponsky JL, Marks JM. Transgastric natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy in humans: a pilot study in efficacy and gastrotomy site selection by using a hybrid technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72:279-283.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部