期刊文献+

经阴道局部病灶清除术联合子宫壁修补术对瘢痕妊娠患者的疗效观察 被引量:13

Effect of transvaginal local lesion removal combined with uterine wall repair in patients with cicatricial pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察经阴道局部病灶清除术联合子宫壁修补术治疗瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效。方法选择2016年9月至2018年9月我院收治的114例剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠患者为研究对象,随机分为2组,各57例,其中对照组予以甲氨喋呤化疗联合清宫术治疗,观察组行经阴道局部病灶清除术联合子宫壁修补术治疗。对比两组术中及术后基本情况,观察治疗后第1、4、7、14d时血清β-HCG水平变化情况,并统计并发症发生情况。结果观察组术后月经复潮时间、术后病灶缩小时间和住院时间分别为(30.52±4.63)d、(5.18±1.32)d和(4.72±1.12)d,均显著短于对照组[分别为(58.05±7.52)d、(8.76±2.02)d和(7.70±1.85)d](P<0.05);观察组术中出血量为(68.12±14.56)ml,显著低于对照组的(86.09±16.10)ml(P<0.05);观察组手术时间、术后子宫下段肌层厚度分别为(42.71±3.25)min、(4.97±0.54)mm,显著高于对照组的(19.26±3.56)min、(2.24±0.36)mm,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后1、4、7、14d时血清β-HCG下降率分别为(48.57±4.62)%、(69.17±5.24)%、(90.10±8.02)%、(98.65±7.94)%,均显著高于同时段对照组的下降率[分别为(17.16±3.40)%、(53.16±6.03)%、(78.13±7.96)%、(92.28±6.15)%,P<0.05)]。观察组并发症发生率显著低于对照组(10.52%vs.28.07%,P<0.05)。结论经阴道局部病灶清除术联合子宫壁修补术治疗瘢痕妊娠临床疗效确切,能有效改善患者血清β-HCG水平,安全性高。 Objective:To observe the clinical effect of transvaginal local lesion clearance combined with uterine wall repair in treatment of scar pregnancy.Methods:A total of 114 patients with scar pregnancy after cesarean section were enrolled in our hospital from September 2016 to September 2018.The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups,57 patients for each group.The patients in control group were treated with methotrexate chemotherapy combined with uterine curettage,and the patients in observation group were treated with transvaginal local lesion clearance combined with uterine repairment.The basic conditions of the two groups during and after surgery were compared,and the changes of serumβ-HCG on day 1,4,7 and 14 after treatment were observed,and the complications were counted.Results:The time of menses return,the time of lesion reduction and the time of hospitalization in the observation group were(30.52±4.63),(5.18±1.32)and(4.72±1.12)days respectively,which were significantly shorter than those in the control group[(58.05 ±7.52)days,(8.76±2.02)days and(7.70±1.85)days](P<0.05).The amount of bleeding in observation group[(68.12±14.56)vs.(86.09±16.10)ml]was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The operation time[(42.71±3.25)vs.(19.26±3.56)min]and the thickness of lower uterine muscle layer[(4.97±0.54)vs.(2.24±0.36)mm]in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The serum beta HCG decline rate on day 1,4,7,14 was(48.57±4.62)%,(69.17±5.24)%,(90.10±8.02)%,(98.65±7.94)%respectively,which was significantly higher than that of control group [(17.16±3.40)%,(53.16±6.03)%,(78.13±7.96)%,(92.28±6.15)%](P<0.05).The incidence of complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(10.52% vs.28.07%,P<0.05).Conclusions:Transvaginal local lesion clearance combined with uterine wall repair in the treatment of scar pregnancy has a definite clinical effect,which can effectively improve the level of serum beta-HCG and has high safety.
作者 赵嫦娥 周晓莉 陈滢 ZHAO Chang-e;ZHOU Xiao-li;CHEN Ying(Wuhan General Hospital of the Chinese People 7s Liberation Army,Wuhan 430000)
出处 《生殖医学杂志》 CAS 2019年第5期469-473,共5页 Journal of Reproductive Medicine
关键词 经阴道局部病灶清除术 子宫壁修补术 瘢痕妊娠 HCG 并发症 Vaginal focal debridement Uterine wall repair Scar pregnancy HCG Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献105

  • 1金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 2吴卫平,李选.急诊双侧子宫动脉栓塞治疗难治性产后大出血[J].介入放射学杂志,2006,15(4):243-245. 被引量:45
  • 3任彤,赵峻,万希润,刘欣燕,冯凤芝,向阳.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断及处理[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(6):433-436. 被引量:169
  • 4Li J B,Kong L Z,Fan L,et al.Transvaginal surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy:analysis of 49 cases from one tertiary care center[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2014,182:102.
  • 5He Y,Wu X,Zhu Q,et al.Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs.uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy:a retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Womens Health,2014,14:116.
  • 6Li YR,Xiao SS,Wan YJ,et al.Analysis of the efficacy of three treatment options for cesarean scar pregnancy management[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2014,40(11):2146.
  • 7Birch PK, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg LC, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studied [ J ]. Fertil Steril,2016, 105 (4) : 958-967. DOI: 10. 1016/j. fertnstert. 2015.12. 130. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
  • 8Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accrete and cesarean scar pregnancy[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2012,201:14- 29. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ajog. 2012.03. 007. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
  • 9Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management [ J]. Uhrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004,23 : 247-253.
  • 10Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarean section searIJ]. Fertility Sterility,1997,67 (2) :398-400.

共引文献458

同被引文献113

引证文献13

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部