摘要
我国宪法基本权利主体包括公民这一基础性主体,以及法人、外国人等非典型基本权利主体。但基本权利主体均符合可辨识性和防御国家的私主体面向的双重特征。国家属于法律主体,但不宜纳入基本权利主体范畴,即便假设国家属于国家所有权的权利主体,也难以解决国家所有权不具备基本权利的防御功能、国家无法防御国家等悖论,且国家同时作为权力和权利双重主体地位会导致权力入侵权利领域。因此国家所有权应该寻求非基本权利的解释路径。
The subjects of basic rights in constitution of our country include citizen as the basic subject, as well as non-typical subjects of basic rights, such as legal persons and foreigners. But the subjects of basic rights accord with the dual characteristics of identifiability and the private subject of country-defense. The state belongs to the legal subject, but it should not be included in the category of subject of basic rights. Even assuming that the state is the subject of the right to national ownership, it is difficult to resolve the paradox that the state ownership does not have the defensive function of the basic rights and that the state cannot defend itself against the state. At the same time, as a dual subject of power and right, the state will result in the fact the power invade the field of rights. Therefore, state ownership should seek the interpretation of non-basic rights.
作者
王逸冉
WANG Yi-ran(Law School,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2019年第2期19-26,共8页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
中国法学会"研究阐释党的十九大精神"重点专项课题"习近平新时代中国特色社会主义法治思想的两大理论创新成果研究"(CLS(2017)ZDZX01)
关键词
国家所有权
基本权利主体
可辨识性
防御功能
state-ownership
the subject of fundamental right
identifiability
the function of defense