基于STEM教育理念的改善小学科学评价方式的对策被引量：6

Based on the STEM Education Idea the Countermeasures to Improve the Primary School Science Evaluation Way

下载PDF

导出

摘要纵观全球教育发展,不难发现STEM教育是未来教育发展的方向。STEM教育具有跨学科性、趣味性、情境性、协作性的特点。对比传统教育,STEM教育更符合现人才培养的要求。21世纪初,我国开始实施科学课程的教学,意在培养具有科学素养的复合型创新人才。对比STEM教育与科学课程的培养目标,可以发现二者在培养目标上是具有一致性的。因此,我们可以借鉴STEM教育的教育理念以解决小学科学教学中评价方式的困境。 All round the world education development trend,it is not difficult to find that STEM education is the direction of education development in the future.STEM education is interdisciplinary,interest,experience,situational,design features,compared to traditional education,STEM education more in line with the requirements of talent training now.In response to the social demand for talent level unceasing enhancement,the 21 st century,China began to implement scientific curriculum teaching,to cultivate innovative talents with scientific literacy.Contrast STEM education and the training goal of science curriculum in our country,found both on the training goal is consistent.Therefore,we can draw lessons from STEM the core concept of education in order to solve problems in the elementary school science teaching evaluation ways in our country.

作者李昱瑛赵福君陈雪琴 LI Yu-ying;ZHAO Fu-jun;CHEN Xue-qin(Teachers' College of Shihezi University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832003,China;Shihezi Twentieth Middle School, Shihezi,Xinjiang 832003,China)

机构地区石河子大学师范学院石河子第二十中学

出处《教育教学论坛》 2019年第19期213-214,共2页 Education And Teaching Forum

基金 2015年度石河子大学教育教学改革项目"信息化条件下<现代教育技术>公共课中实施混合式学习的探索与实践"(KG-2015-12) 2017年度石河子大学混合式教学改革专项项目基于"THEOL平台的<现代教育技术>混合式教学改革的研究与实践"(BL2017055) 2017全国教育信息技术研究课题"基于THEOL平台的<现代教育技术>课程混合式学习的探索与实践"(176130001)

关键词 STEM教育小学科学评价方式 STEM education the elementary school science evaluation way

分类号 G622.0 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1余胜泉,胡翔.STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J].开放教育研究,2015,21(4):13-22. 被引量：1022

二级参考文献22

1秦炜炜.全球化时代美国教育的STEM战略[J].教育技术资讯,2007(10).
2Asghar, A. , Ellington,R. , Rice, E. , et al. (2012). Support- ing Stem Education in secondary science contexts [ J ]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2) : 4.
3Bruning, R. H. , Schraw, J. G. , Norby, M. M. & Ronning, R. R. ( 2004 ) Cognitive psychology and instruction [ M ]. Columbus, OH : Pearson.
4Byhee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 version[ J:. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70( 1 ) :30-35.
5Frykholm J, Glasson G. (2005). Connecting science and mathe- matics instruction: pedagogical context knowledge for teachers [ J ]. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3): 127-141.
6Herschbach D. R. (2011 ). The stem initiative: constraints and challenges. [J]. Journal of Stem Teacher Education, 48( 1 ) : 96-122.
7Hurd, P. D. (1975) Science,Technology, and Society: New Coals for Interdisciplinary Science Teaching [ J ]. Science Teacher, 42 (2) : 27-30.
8Johnson L. , Adams becker S. , Cummins M. , et al. (2013). Technology outlook for community, technical, and junior colleges 2013- 2018: An N MC Horizon Project sector analysis [ J ]. Austin, Texas: the New Media Consortium.
9Lai Enying, Zhang Yushan, & Wang Jianhua(2012 ). Develo- ping students" engineering concepts with learning module aids[A]. 2nd International STEM in Education Conference [ EB/OL]. http:// stem2012, bnu. edu. cn.
10Mann, A. , & Oldknow A. ( 2012 ). School - industry STEM links in the UK: A report commissioned by Futurelab[ J]. Education and Employers : 1-32.