摘要
宏观经济进入后工业化转型时期,如何更新工业遗存,实现经济、产业与空间的成功转型已成为当下我国城市建设亟待解决的问题。文创园区型更新具有较高的经济效益与社会效益,成为当前工业遗产更新的一种主要模式。文章以南京晨光1865文创园区和台北华山文创园区为案例作对比研究,总结出效率模式和体验模式。研究发现效率模式下产业迅速进驻,但相比体验模式,空间的活力明显不足,对于创新产业的推动作用也有所欠缺。基于研究,文章认为文创园区型城市工业遗产更新应更加关注于空间体验以及文化丰富度的提升,以促进创新产业的培育,同时为城市创造更好的生活、居住、游憩氛围。
China’s economy is undergoing a post-industrial transformation. How to achieve a successful transformation of the economy, industrial and space have become an urgent problem to be solved. Due to its high economic and social benefits, Wenchuang Park has become the main mode of industrial heritage renewal. This article takes Nanjing Chenguang 1865 Wenchuang Park and Taipei Huashan Wenchuang Park as a case study and summarizes the efficiency mode and experience mode. The study found that the industry quickly entered the park in the efficiency mode. But compared with the experience mode, the vitality of the space is obviously insufficient, and the promotion of the innovation industry is also lacking. Based on the research, the author argues that Wenchuang Park-type industrial heritage renewal ought to pay more attention to spatial experience and cultural richness, to promote the cultivation of innovative industries, and create a better livable and vibrant atmosphere for the city.
出处
《建筑与文化》
2019年第5期157-159,共3页
Architecture & Culture
关键词
工业遗产
更新
文创园区
空间体验
industrial heritage renewal
wenchuang park
spatial experience