监察法与刑法的衔接协调与规范运行

On the Coordination and Normative Operation of the Supervision Law and the Criminal Law

监察法的生效实施使其从静态规范转化为动态运行,在此过程中需要正视关联性法律的衔接协调问题。监察委员会行使的职务犯罪调查作为后期诉讼程序推进的基础,因其罪责追究的特定属性而与刑法关系紧密。在监察对象的明确规定上,监察法调整职务违法与职务犯罪的一体性决定了其比刑法更为宽泛,但是在内涵上仍然延续了刑法对公职犯罪的实质要求。监察法未把单位主体纳入监察范畴带来了刑法适用上的空缺,单纯程序补正无法遮蔽实体规定适用上的短板。监察委员会的性质定位决定了监察主体刑责追究在部分职务犯罪主体上的非对应性,权力边界与刑法平等原则未能一体遵循,应当在恪守罪刑法定原则的基础上通过立法解释或者法律修订予以弥补。监察委员会在行使职务犯罪调查权时,与刑罚适用中的时效制度、自首制度和认罪认罚从宽制度存在规范上的非一致性,由于难以排斥监察委员会调查行为与上述刑罚制度的价值契合,因而需要通过刑事实体法的调整来解决彼此之间的非协调性,从而保证监察法与刑法之间的衔接顺畅和规范运行。

The implementation of the Ssupervision Llaw has been transformed it from static specification to dynamic operation.,Dduring this process,it is necessary to face up todeal with the cohesion and coordination issues between relevant laws.The duty crime investigations carried out by the supervision committee are the basis for the promotion initiation of the subsequentlate litigation procedures which is closely related to the criminal law because of the specific attributes of culpability.In the clear provisions of the supervision object,the Ssupervision Llaw adjusts duty violation and duty crime,which and the both haves a higher consistency which determininges that it is broader than criminal law,but it still continues the substantive requirements of criminal law against public office crimes.The Ssupervision Llaw does not bring unit subject into the scope of supervision,causing vacancies in the application of criminal law,and the simple procedure remedy cannot cover the short board in the application of substantive provisions.The nature orientation of the supervision committee determines the non-correspondence between criminal accountability for the monitoring subject and partial duty crime subject.,tThe power boundary and the equality principle of the criminal law fail to get the corresponding compliance,so it should be compensated through legislative interpretation or legal amendment on the basis of abiding the principle of legally prescribed punishment.When the supervision committee conducts duty crime investigations there exists non-conformity with prescription system,surrender system and the lenient system of pleading guilty and confessing punishment,because it is difficult to exclude the performance of the supervision committee from the value of the above-mentioned penalty system.,tTherefore,it is necessary to solve the non-coordination between each other through the timely adjustment of the criminal substantive law in order,to ensure the rational convergence and standardized operation between the supervision law and the criminal law.