期刊文献+

基于犹豫模糊语言熵的纯语言多属性决策方法

Pure Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision-making Method Based on Entropy Measures of HFLTSs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于决策环境的复杂性以及人类思维的模糊性,人们所面临的犹豫语言信息多属性决策问题,其属性权重常是未知的。为解决这一问题,我们给出一种基于犹豫模糊熵的多属性决策方法。将模糊熵引入到犹豫模糊语言理论中,在提出犹豫模糊语言熵公理化定义的基础上,给出一个新的犹豫模糊语言熵计算公式。再利用文中给出的熵获取属性权重,并在此基础上计算每个方案和负理想解的贴近度,进而得到方案的排序结果。算例结果表明所给决策方法的有效性和可行性。 People always faced with multi-criteria decision making problems with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and criteria weights are completely unknown,due to the complexity of the socio-economic environment and the ambiguity of human thinking.To solve this problem,we propose a method of multiple attribute decision making based on the HFLTSs entropy.At first,the axiomatic definition of HFLTSs entropy is presented and a corresponding formula is structured.On this basis,the optimum solutions are found by the comparison of the closeness coefficient between every choice and the negative ideal solution.The feasibility and validity of this approach are illustrated by an example.
作者 张金波 ZHANG Jinbo(College of Finance and Mathematics,West Anhui University,Lu an 237012,China)
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2019年第2期25-29,共5页 Journal of West Anhui University
基金 安徽省高等学校省级质量工程教学研究重大项目(2016jyxm1096) 科技平台"金融风险智能控制与预警中心"(0044015005) 安徽高校省级自然科学研究项目(KJ2013Z344) 六安市定向委托皖西学院产学研合作项目(2012LW012)
关键词 多属性决策 犹豫模糊语言术语集 理想解 Multi-criteria decision making Entropy Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets Ideal solution
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:66
  • 2Levrat E., VoisinA., Bombardier S., Bremont J. Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy set techniques[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1997, 12:891-913.
  • 3Bordogna G. , Fedrizzi M. , Passi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, 27:126-132.
  • 4Herrera F. , Martinez L. A 2 tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8: 746- 752.
  • 5Wang R C. Chuu S J. Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154 : 563- 572.
  • 6Herrera F. , Herrera-Viedma E. , Verdegay J. L.. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78:73-87.
  • 7Herrera F. , Martinez L.. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranualr hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2001, 31:227-233.
  • 8王应明.运用离差最大化方法进行多指标决策与排序[J].系统工程与电子技术,1998,20(7):24-26. 被引量:230
  • 9钱吴永,党耀国,熊萍萍,王正新.基于灰色关联定权的TOPSIS法及其应用[J].系统工程,2009,27(8):124-126. 被引量:69
  • 10李刚,迟国泰,程砚秋.基于熵权TOPSIS的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程学报,2011,26(3):400-407. 被引量:84

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部