期刊文献+

不同孕周未足月胎膜早破保胎时间对母婴结局的影响 被引量:5

Effects of tTreatments on Pregnancy Outcome from Different Gestational Weeks of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同孕周未足月胎膜早破保胎时间对母婴结局的影响。方法方便选择120例于2017年1—12月间在该院接受诊治的未足月胎膜早破孕产妇为研究对象,将孕周小于34周和孕周≥34周的入组者各分一个小组,比较两组母婴结局,另对保胎时间<48 h和保胎时间≥48 h的母婴结局进行对比。结果孕周<34周的孕产妇和新生儿并发症发生率,高于孕周≥34周的孕产妇和新生儿并发症发生率,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=6.708,P<0.05);不同孕周未足月胎膜早破保胎时间<48 h的母婴结局比较上差异无统计学意义(χ~2=1.294,P>0.05),保胎时间≥48 h且孕周<34周的孕产妇和新生儿并发症发生率明显高于相同保胎时间且孕周≥34周的未足月胎膜早破者,差异存在统计学意义(χ~2=5.175,P<0.05)。结论对未足月胎膜早破孕产妇而言,保胎时间越短,并发症发生风险越低,安全性越高;保胎时间一致时,孕周越短,并发症发生几率越高。 Objective To explore the influence of different gestational weeks(GW)on pregnancy outcome ofpreterm premature rupture of membranes(PPROM).Methods 120 pregnant women with the PPR0 M who were treated in our hospital from January to December 2017 were convenient selected as the subjects.Patients with the GW<34 weeks and≥34 weeks were divided into two groups,respectively,and the outcome of these two groups was compared,as well asthe outcome from the fetal protection(FP)hours<48 hours and≥48 hours.Results The complication probability(CP)of pregnant women with the GW<34 weeks was,significantly higher than that of pregnant women with the GW≥34 weeks(P<0.05,χ^2=6.708).There was no significant difference in patients of the PPR0 M with the FP<48 h(χ^2=1.294,P>0.05).The CP of pregnant women with the FP≥48 h and GW<34 weeks was significantly higher than that of patients with the same FP when theGW≥34 weeks(χ^2=5.175,P<0.05).Conclusion For pregnant women with the PPR0 M,the shorter FPcontributes to the lower risk of CP and higher safety,whilethe shorter GW leads to the higher risk of CP.
作者 王贺红 WANG He-hong(Department of Obstetrics,People's Hospital of Beijing Daxing District,Beijing,102600 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2019年第9期58-60,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 孕周 未足月胎膜早破 保胎时间 母婴结局 Gestational week(GW) Preterm premature rupture of membranes(PPR0M) Fetal protection(FP)hours Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献58

  • 1漆洪波,吴味辛.重视未足月胎膜早破的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(1):3-6. 被引量:171
  • 2梁琴,周启昌.胎儿肺发育不良的研究现状与进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(12):858-860. 被引量:13
  • 3乐杰.妇产科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:145.
  • 4丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:368.
  • 5Gibbs RS, Blanco JD. Premature rupture of the mem- branes[J]. Obstet Gynecol,1982,60(6) :671-679.
  • 6Moore RM, Mansour JM,Redline RW, et ah The physiol ogy of fetal membrane rupture: insight gained from the determination of physical properties [J]. Placenta, 2006, 27(11/12) : 1037-1051.
  • 7DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, etal. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatoty response,and pregnancy outcome in wome nwith preterm prelabor rupture of membranes[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2010,64 ( 1 ) : 38-57.
  • 8Aaron BC,Julian NR, Errol RN, et al. Contemporary diag- nosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes[J]. Rev Obstet Gynecol, 2008,1 (1) : 11-22.
  • 9Daniel BD,Roberto R,Juan PK,et al. Prevalerice and di- versity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal Inflam- matory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol,2010,64(1) :38-57.
  • 10刘芳,漆洪波.早产胎膜早破的治疗[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,24(5):343-345. 被引量:52

共引文献161

同被引文献40

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部