期刊文献+

Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study 被引量:2

Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective To understand the distribution of the average glandular dose(AGD) in mammography by investigating 1,828 exposure parameters of 8 mammography machines in three cities, by using random sampling. Methods A survey of 8 mammography machines in three different cities, sampled using stratified random sampling methods, was performed, and 1,828 mammography exposure parameters were recorded. Incident air kerma(k) was measured by Quality-Assurance(QA) dosimeters, and AGD was calculated by series conversion coefficients based on a 3D detailed Monte Carlo breast model, published by Wang et al. Results The distribution of compressed breast thickness(CBT) fitted a normal distribution, while that of AGD fitted a skewed distribution. The mean value of CBT in a medio-lateral oblique(MLO) view was about 5.6% higher than that in the craniocaudal(CC) view, with significant statistical difference; mean value of AGD and CBT in the sample was 1.3 mGy and 4.6 cm, respectively. The AGD trended upward with increasing CBT, similar to the results of other researches. Conclusion The mean AGD and CBT levels in our study for mammography practice in China were 1.3 mGy and 4.6 cm, respectively. AGD is influenced by manufacturer-specific variation as machine response to CBT changes and target/filter combination. The present study can provide evidence for establishing a diagnostic reference level in China. Objective To understand the distribution of the average glandular dose(AGD) in mammography by investigating 1,828 exposure parameters of 8 mammography machines in three cities, by using random sampling. Methods A survey of 8 mammography machines in three different cities, sampled using stratified random sampling methods, was performed, and 1,828 mammography exposure parameters were recorded. Incident air kerma(k) was measured by Quality-Assurance(QA) dosimeters, and AGD was calculated by series conversion coefficients based on a 3D detailed Monte Carlo breast model, published by Wang et al. Results The distribution of compressed breast thickness(CBT) fitted a normal distribution, while that of AGD fitted a skewed distribution. The mean value of CBT in a medio-lateral oblique(MLO) view was about 5.6% higher than that in the craniocaudal(CC) view, with significant statistical difference; mean value of AGD and CBT in the sample was 1.3 mGy and 4.6 cm, respectively. The AGD trended upward with increasing CBT, similar to the results of other researches. Conclusion The mean AGD and CBT levels in our study for mammography practice in China were 1.3 mGy and 4.6 cm, respectively. AGD is influenced by manufacturer-specific variation as machine response to CBT changes and target/filter combination. The present study can provide evidence for establishing a diagnostic reference level in China.
出处 《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第4期242-249,共8页 生物医学与环境科学(英文版)
基金 supported by the Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program [CXTDA2017029] Jiangsu Province's Key Medical Discipline of Epidemiology [ZDXK A 2016008] Science and education strong industry engineering youth talent project [JKRC2016014] Jiangsu Provincial preventive medicine research project [Y2018082]
关键词 Medical radiation MAMMOGRAPHY Compressed BREAST thickness AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSE Medical radiation Mammography Compressed breast thickness Average glandular dose
分类号 Q [生物学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Boyle P and Ferlay J.Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004.Ann Oncol, 2005; 16,481-8.
  • 2Dance DR, Young KC, and van Engen RE.Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.Phys Med Bioi, 2009; 54,4361-72.
  • 3Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, et at, Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.Phys Med Bioi, 2000; 45, 3225-40.
  • 4Tsapaki V, Tsalafoutas lA, Poga V, et al, Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.J Radiol Prot, 2008; 28, 337-46.
  • 5Jamal N, Ng KH, and McLean D.A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.Br J Radiol, 2003; 76, 238-45.
  • 6Ciraj-Bjelac 0, Avramova-Cholakova S, Beganovic A, et al.Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.Eur J Radiol, 2012; 81, 2161-8.
  • 70duko J, Young K, and Burch A.A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009.2010; 6136,365-70.
  • 8Robinson M and Kotre CJ.Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography.Br J Radiol, 2008; 81, 214-8.
  • 9McCuliagh JB, Baldelli P, and Phelan N.Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.Br J Radiol, 2011; 84, 1027-33.
  • 10Baldelli P, McCullagh J, Phelan N, et el.Comprehensive dose survey of breast screening in Ireland.Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2011; 145, 52-60.

共引文献1

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部