摘要
在人民法院信息化3.0版的主体框架已然搭建起来的今天,中国法院借力于信息化建设的司法公开工作却因为有意或无意所存在的知性"茫然",陷入"满意率陷阱"中,出现感性"热闹"下的理性"偏失",导致司法公开的规范文件与司法现状存在不适,司法公开的实际效果与民众预期存在差异以及司法公开的方法运用与司法实践存在失调。为进一步深化"互联网+"时代的司法公开工作,实现网络时代中"弱化中强化的司法"和"极化中弱化的民意"衡平,应从理论实证双重角度解析司法公开在基本理念、主要原则、运行载体、制度机制等方面的异同,寻找符合大数据时代的司法公开的中国方案。
There are differences between the actual effect of law publicity and people's expectations as well as imbalance between the application of judicial publicity and judicial practice.In order to further deepen the work of judicial openness in the era of"Internet +"and realize the balance between"weakening and strengthening of justice"and"polarization of weakening public opinion"in the Internet age,we should analyze the similarities and differences of judicial publicity in basic concepts,main principles,operational carriers and institutional mechanisms from a theoretical and empirical perspective.
作者
林坤
LIN Kun(China Institute of Applied Jurisprudence,The Supreme Peoples'Court,Beijing 100062,China)
出处
《山西师大学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第3期72-77,共6页
Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
福建省法学会重点课题(FLS(2017)A3)
