期刊文献+

惩罚、奖励与合作行为——基于礼物交换博弈实验的对比研究 被引量:2

Punishment,Reward,and Cooperative Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引入惩罚和奖励机制的礼物交换博弈实验,研究惩罚和奖励是否会影响人们的合作行为,进而判断利用惩罚和奖励是否真的可以达到预期激励效果。通过基准实验局、惩罚实验局、奖励实验局、惩罚奖励实验局四种不同实验的对比分析,证实了惩罚和奖励确实影响人们的合作行为。研究发现:从企业的角度来说,企业拥有惩罚权利时,更愿意提供较高的工资;相比于单纯的惩罚或奖励机制,同时拥有惩罚和奖励双重机制时,企业提供的工资水平对工人的努力程度影响更大。从工人的角度来说,存在惩罚和奖励双重机制时,工人提供的努力程度对工人的收益影响最大。 The gift exchange game experiment of the punishment and reward mechanism is introduced to study whether the punishment and reward will affect people’s cooperative behavior,and then judge whether the punishment and reward can achieve the expected incentive effect.Through the comparative analysis of four different experiments,namely benchmark experiment game,punishment experiment game,reward experiment game and punishment reward experiment game,it is confirmed that punishment and reward do affect people’s cooperative behavior.The study found that:from the perspective of enterprises,they are more willing to offer higher wages when they have the right to punish.Compared with the pure punishment or reward mechanism,with both punishment and reward mechanism,the wage level provided by the enterprise has a greater impact on the level of workers’efforts.From the perspective of workers,when there is a dual mechanism of punishment and reward,the degree of effort provided by workers has the greatest impact on workers’benefits.
作者 骆欣庆 刘剑锋 谢骏杰 Luo Xinqing;Liu Jianfeng;Xie Junjie(MTA/MBA Education Center,Beijing International Studies University,Beijing 100024,China;School of International Business,Beijing International Studies University,Beijing 100024,China)
出处 《经济与管理》 CSSCI 2019年第3期26-35,共10页 Economy and Management
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(12CJL007) 北京第二外国语学院"实验经济学实践教学基地"项目
关键词 惩罚 奖励 合作行为 礼物交换博弈实验 punishment reward cooperative behavior the gift exchange game
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献89

  • 1夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量:31
  • 2Andreoni,J.and L.Vesterlund,2001,"Which ls the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism," The Quarterly Journal of Economies,116(1):293-312.
  • 3Berg,J.,J.Dickhaut and K.McCabe,1995,"Trust,Reciprocity,and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior,10(1):122-142.
  • 4Bohnet,I.and B.S.Frey,1999,"Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games:Comment," The A-merican Economic Review,89(1):335-339.
  • 5Buchan,N.,R.Croson and S.Solnick,2008,"Trust and Gender:An Examination of Behavior,Biases and Beliefs in the Investment Game," Jounml of Economic Behavior and Organization,68(3-4):466-476.
  • 6Camerer,C.,2003,Behavioral Game Theory:Experiments in Strategic Interaction,Published by Princeton University Press.
  • 7Coleman,J.,1990,Foundations of Social Theory,Published by the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • 8Cox,J.,2004,"How to Identify Trust and Reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior,46(2):260-281.
  • 9Eckel,C.and P.Grossman,2002,"Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes toward Financial Risk," Eho-lution and Human Behavior,23(4):281-295.
  • 10Falk,A.and C.Zender,2007,"Discrimination and In-Group Favoritism in a Citywide Trust Experiment," IZA Discussion Paper,No.2765,Zurich IEER Working Paper,No.318.

共引文献112

同被引文献20

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部