期刊文献+

理解科学学习过程中的话语认同——基于课堂论证的互动分析 被引量:2

Understanding Discourse Identity in Science Learning——Based on the Interaction Analysis of Classroom Argumentation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论证是科学社区重要的话语实践形式,将论证引入课堂需要学生使用符合学科规范的话语体系,形成对科学话语的认同感。本研究基于社会文化和社会语言学理论,以上海市某初级中学六年级学生科学课堂的论证活动为背景,探究教师如何帮助学生建立科学话语认同感,促进学生平等、有效地参与科学论证。课堂视频互动分析结果表明教师创设了一个具有全纳性的对话空间,并最大程度地利用混杂性,帮助学生从正确答案的被动接受者变成竞争性观点的积极提出者和评估者。 Argumentation is the important discourse practice in scientific community. Introducing it to classroom requires students use the discourse system which is fit with disciplinary norms and form the corresponding discursive identity. By drawing on sociocultural and sociolinguistic accounts, this study sought to understand how teaching, as enacted in Grade -6 argumentative activities in science classroom in a Shanghai Middle School, affords students opportunities for discursive identity construction and facilitates students’ equal and effective participation in scientific argumentation. The interaction analysis of video data revealed that teacher created an inclusive dialogue space and utilized its heterogeneity extremely, which help students move from passive receivers of correct answer to active constructors and evaluators of competitive claims.
作者 宋歌 Song Ge(China Normal University,Shanghai 200062;Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007)
出处 《当代教育论坛》 北大核心 2019年第3期112-120,共9页 forum on contemporary education
关键词 科学话语 身份认同 话语认同 科学论证 互动分析 scientific discourse identity discursive identity scientific argumentation interaction analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1[美]罗蒂.哲学和自然之镜[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 2[美]布鲁克菲尔德,普瑞斯基尔.讨论式教学法:实现民主课堂的方法与技巧[M].罗静,褚保堂译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002:90,8.
  • 3Burbules,N.C.(1993).Dialogue in Teaching:Theory and Practice[M].New York and London:Teachers College,Co-lumbia University,pp.19-20,34.
  • 4Oakeshott,M.(1975).The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind,in Rationalism and Politics[M].New York:Methuen,p.198.
  • 5Bernstein,R.J.(1983).Beyond objectivism and relativism:Sci-ence,hermeneutics,and praxis[M].Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,p.226.
  • 6Young,I.M.(1990)Justice and the politics of difference[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,p.300.
  • 7Bauer,D.M.(1988).Feminist dialogue:A theory of failed community[M].Albany:State University of New York Press,p.xiii.
  • 8Green,J.M.(1999).Deep democracy:Diversity,community,and transformation[M].Lanham,MD:Rowman&Littlefield,p.60.
  • 9Burbules,N.C.,&Rice,S.(1991).Dialogue across difference:Continuing the conversation[J].Harvard Educational Review61,pp.393-416.
  • 10Bridges,D.(1988).Education,democracy and discussion.New York:University Press of America,pp.21-24.

共引文献197

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部