期刊文献+

老年假性球麻痹患者营养风险的NRS筛查结果评估及护理干预

Screening and Estimation of nutrition risk among elderly patients with Pseudobulbar palsy and its nursing intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:采用营养风险筛查(NRS2002)法评价老年假性球麻痹患者的营养状况。方法:选择年龄≥65岁的300例老年假性球麻痹患者为研究对象,采用NRS2002对患者的营养状况进行评价,同时测定其人体参数及血液生化指标,并比较分析不同年龄组患者的营养状态。结果:老年假性球麻痹患者营养风险者167例,无营养风险者133例,两组患者体重指数(BMI)、上臂围(AC)、小腿围(CC)及白蛋白(ALB)、血红蛋白(Hb)、总淋巴细胞计数(TLC)水平比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);≥75岁患者营养风险的发生率显著高于65~74岁年龄组的患者(P<0.05)。结论:NRS2002可有效评价老年假性球麻痹患者的营杀状况,且老年假性球麻痹患者营养风险发生率高,尤其是高龄患者,应重视老年假性球麻痹患者的营养筛查,给予恰当的营养支持. Objective: To screen and evaluate the nutrition condition of elderly patients with pseudoubulbar palsy with NRS2002 (Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). Methods: 300≥65 years old patients were evaluate with NKS2002 and the body parameters and blood biochemical parameters were measured. The nutrition condition was compared in different age groups (P<0.05). Results: Among 300 elderly patients with Pseudobulbar palsy, 167 patients were suffered nutrition risk but 133 patients were under normal condtion. In these two groups, The differences between body mass index (BMI), arm circumference (AC), calf circumference (CC), albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb) and total leukocytes (TLC)(P<0.05) were significant The incidence of nutrition risk was significant higher in ≥75 years old group compared with 65-74 years old group (P<0.05). Con elusion: NRS2002 can effectively evaluate the nutrition con dition of elderly patients with Pseudobulbar palsy. The nutrition risk in above 75 years old group patients with Pseudobulbar palsy was higher than that in65-74 years old group patients.
作者 温士玲 张静 孙彦君 宋丽丽 于倩 WEN Shi-ling;ZHANG Jing;SUN Yan-jun(Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Jinan 250014)
出处 《医学检验与临床》 2019年第3期38-40,共3页 Medical Laboratory Science and Clinics
基金 人山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2013BJYB23号).
关键词 性球麻痹 老年人 营养风险 Pseudobulbar palsy The elderly Nutrition Risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1包乐珊.脑卒中致假性球麻痹患者吞咽功能障碍康复护理[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2005,11(6):629-630. 被引量:17
  • 2Sobotka L Basics in clinical nutrition [M]. 3rd. London: Galen, 2004: 11-18.
  • 3Kondrup J, Rasmussen H, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS2002) : a new method based on an a- nalysis of controlled clinical trials [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22 ( 3 ) :321-336.
  • 4Jiang Z, Chen W, Zhan W, et al. Parenteral and enteral nutrition application in West, Middle and East of China: a multi-centre investigation for 15098 patients in 13 metropolitans using NRS tool [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2007, 2 ( Suppl ) : 133-134.
  • 5Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia MB, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002 [J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(4) : 415-421.
  • 6Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [ J ]. JPEN, 1987, 11(1):8-13.
  • 7Gazzotti C, Albert A, Pepinster A, et al. Clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) scale in geriatric medicine [ J]. J Nuix Health Aging, 2000, 4 (3) : 176-181.
  • 8Orrevall Y, Tishelman C, Permert J, et al. Nutritional support and risk status among cancer patients in palliative home care services [J/OL]. Support Care Cancer, 2008, [2008-06-05 ]. http://www. springerlink. eom/content/y2357n3-722784q4h/fulltext. html.
  • 9Haldun G, Eren E, Recep A, et al. Evaluation of nutritional risk on admission to the general surgery department [J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2008, 109(2):57-60.
  • 10Bauer JM, Sieber CC. Significance and diagnosis of malnutrition in the elderly [ J ]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, 2007, 101/9) :605-609.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部