期刊文献+

高值药品医保支付管理实践比较研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study on the Practice of Medical Insurance Payment Management for High-value Drugs
原文传递
导出
摘要 许多创新药物研发过程存在高风险、长周期的特点,药企使得在专利期内选择高定价策略,以获得收益回报。对各国医疗卫生及医疗保险管理部门而言,此类高值药品产生的卫生费用支出与患者用药可及性等问题,始终是重要的研究议题。本文研究发现我国大部分地区主要以特药保障或大病保险等形式对高值药品进行管理,而澳大利亚和新西兰通过建立高值药品的独立目录,以促进药品的可及性。本文研究结论揭示:随着新药上市速度加快、患者用药需求加大,对高值药品开展科学评估与管理是必然趋势。 The high-risk, long-cycle R&D process has enabled many innovative drugs to choose high pricing strategies during the patent period to generate a return on their income. For national health and medical insurance management departments, the issue of health expenditures and accessibility of patients with such high-value drugs has always been an important issue. This paper finds that in most parts of China, high-value drugs are mainly managed in the form of special drug protection or major illness insurance, while Australia and New Zealand promote the accessibility of drugs by establishing an independent catalogue of high-value drugs. With the speed of new drug marketing and the increasing demand for patients, it is an inevitable trend to carry out scientific evaluation and management of high-value drugs.
出处 《价格理论与实践》 北大核心 2019年第1期60-62,152,共4页 Price:Theory & Practice
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目<我国创新药物政策环境研究>(15ZDB167)
关键词 高值药品 界定标准 医保支付 High Value Drugs Defined Standards Medical Insurance Payment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2012[EB/OL]. [2012-06-03]. http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_heahh_ statistics/2012/en/.
  • 2VogenbergFR.应用药物经济学[M].俞雄,周琦奕,陈扬,译.北京:化学工业出版社,2010:40-43.
  • 3DrummondF,SculpherJ,TorranceW,etal.卫生保健项目经济学评估方法[M].李士雪,译3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:110-120.
  • 4L·普里斯特.消费者产品质保理论一种[A].//唐纳德·A·威特曼.法律经济学文献精选.北京:法律出版社,2006:173-179.
  • 5Ehreth J, Willians D. European pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement conference[J]. Expert Review of Pharmacoe- comomics & Outcomes Research, 2009,9( 1 ):37-39.
  • 6Towse P, Grainger D L, Downs K E. Coverage with evidence development: applications and issues[J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2010,26(1):79-85.
  • 7Livio G A, Gianluigi C A. Risk sharing agreements: what les- sons from Italy[J]. International Journal of Technology Asses -sment in Health Care, 2011,27(2):169-172.
  • 8邓练兵,徐宁,王保真.我国城乡地区医疗救助政策分析及改进[J].中国卫生经济,2010,29(5):36-39. 被引量:5
  • 9张楠,石学峰,吴晶.增量成本效果比在卫生技术评估中的应用[J].中国卫生政策研究,2012,5(2):64-68. 被引量:73
  • 10高健,秦龙.论“最不利者”的机会公平保障问题[J].求实,2014(5):68-73. 被引量:2

共引文献9

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部