期刊文献+

3.0T高分辨磁共振成像在直肠癌T分期及分化程度差异分析中的应用 被引量:14

Application of 3.0T High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Difference of T Stage and Degree of Differentiation of Rectal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究高分辨磁共振成像在直肠癌肿瘤T分期及分化程度差异分析中的意义。方法回顾性分析48例直肠癌病人的临床和影像学资料。将磁共振单纯T2加权像(T2WI)与T2WI结合弥散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)两种成像方式确诊直肠癌T分期的正确率进行比较,分析直肠癌DWI的指数化表观扩散系数(exponential apparent diffusion coeffcient,eADC)、表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coeffcient,ADC)与T分期的关联性;分析eADC值、ADC值与直肠癌有无远处转移及其分化程度是否相关。结果单独T2WI与T2WI结合DWI两种成像方式确诊直肠癌T分期正确率分别为77.1%、85.4%,两种方法的结果具用关联性(χ~2=22.693,P<0.01,C=0.956),两种方法检出正确率差异无统计学意义(P=0.125)。直肠癌在DWI图像上(b=1000s·mm^(-2)),均表现为高信号,病理T1、T2、T3和T4分期直肠癌平均ADC值依次减低,eADC值依次升高(P<0.05)。不同分化程度的直肠癌患者的ADC值、eADC值差异有统计学意义(b=1000s·mm^(-2)),(χ~2=8.256,P=0.016;F=4.915,P=0.012)。无转移组和有转移组直肠癌患者病灶ADC值和eADC值差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 DWI可在某种程度上提高常规T2WI序列对于直肠癌T分期的确诊;ADC值及eADC值与肿瘤的T分期及分化程度有关。 Objective To investigate the significance of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the analysis of difference of the T stage and degree of differentiation of rectal cancer.Methods The clinical and imaging data of 48 patients with rectal cancer was retrospectively analyzed.The diagnostic accuracy of T staging of rectal cancer was compared between pure T2 weighted imaging(T2WI)and diffusion weighted imaging(DWI).The correlation between exponential apparent diffusion coeffcient(eADC),apparent diffusion coeffcient(ADC)and T staging of rectal cancer was analyzed.Whether eADC value and ADC value were correlated with distant metastasis and differentiation of rectal cancer were analyzed.Results The T2WI and T2WI combined with DWI imaging methods for the diagnosis of rectal cancer T-stage coincidence rates were 77.1%and 85.4%,respectively.After paired four table chi-square tests,the results of the two methods were correlated(χ^2=22.693,P=0.000),but the detection accuracy of the two methods was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Rectal cancer showed high signal on DWI images(b=1000s·mm^-2).The average ADC value of rectal cancer in pathological T1,T2,T3 and T4 stages gradually decreased,and the average eADC value gradually raised,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01 or<0.05).The difference in ADC value and eADC value between patients with different degrees of differentiation was statistically significant(b=1000 s·mm^-2),(χ^2=8.256,P=0.016;F=4.915,P=0.012).There was no statistical significance on ADC and eADC values between the presence or absence of rectal cancer distant metastasis(P>0.05).Conclusion DWI can improve the diagnosis of rectal cancer T staging by increasing the conventional T2WI sequence to some extent.The ADC value and eADC value are closely related to the T stage and differentiation of the tumor.
作者 王玉娟 陈勇 吕茜婷 何玉鹏 高知玲 WANG Yujuan;CHEN Yong;LV Qianting;HE Yupeng;GAO Zhiling(School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China;Department of Radiology,the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004,China)
出处 《宁夏医科大学学报》 2019年第3期249-253,共5页 Journal of Ningxia Medical University
基金 宁夏重点研发计划科技惠民项目(2016KJHM63) 宁夏医科大学重点项目(XZ2016005)
关键词 直肠癌 高分辨率磁共振 扩散加权成像 T分期 分化程度 rectal cancer high-resolution magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging T stage degree of differentiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1Charles F Bellows,Bernard Jaffe,Lorenzo Bacigalupo,Salvatore Pucciarelli,Guiseppe Gagliardi.在直肠的癌症的磁性的回声成像调查结果的临床的意义[J].World Journal of Radiology,2011,3(4):92-104. 被引量:19
  • 2Ming Li Jin Gu.Changing patterns of colorectal cancer in China over a period of 20 years[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(30):4685-4688. 被引量:93
  • 3Koh D M, Takahara T, Imai Y, et al. Practical aspects of assess- ing tumors using clinical diffusion-weighted imaging in the body [J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2007, 6(4) : 211-224.
  • 4Gu J, Khong P L, Wang S, et al. Quantitative assessment ofdif fusion weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal canc- er:correlation with FDG-PET/CT[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2011 13(5): 1020- 1028.
  • 5Monson J R,Weiser M R, Buie W D, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (Revised)[J]. Dis Colon Rec- tum, 2013, 56(5): 535-550.
  • 6Frasson M, Garcia-Granero E, Roda D, et al. Preoperative che- moradiation may not always be needed for patients with T3 and T2N+ rectal cancer[J]. Cancer, 2011, 117(14): 3118 -3125.
  • 7Beaumont C, Pandey T, Gaines Fricke R, et al. MR Evaluation of rectal cancer: current concepts[J]. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 2013, 42(3): 99-112.
  • 8Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J, et al. Perineural invasion is an inde- pendent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer[J].J Clin On- col, 2009, 27(31): 5131-5137.
  • 9Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2015[J]. J Nail Compr Canc Netw, 2015, 13(6) :719-728; quiz 728.
  • 10Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, et al. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high- resolution magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(3) :355-364. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4034.

共引文献90

同被引文献112

引证文献14

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部