摘要
基于共词分析法,将体育学科研究相关文献的关键词进行核心—边缘分析、聚类和中介性分析,发现中介性不为零的词条过多,学科研究边界模糊,且体育学科主流研究方向过度偏重于"体育教育",与学科研究的其他方面关联甚少,反映出原有学科体系划分方式的知识结构有失偏颇、包容性不足,对体育实践的其他领域引领作用有限。研究认为:体育学二级学科重构以体育实践为依据,可划分为体育教育学、体育健身学、体育竞技学和体育休闲学;同时阐述合理划分三级学科的必要性,并以深度表达和降维表达的方式重构三级学科。
Based on the method of co-word analysis, this paper carried out core-edge analysis, cluster analysis and intermediary analysis on the key words in the relevant literature of sports disciplinary research, and found that there were too many entries with no intermediary. The boundary of discipline research was vague, and the mainstream research direction of P.E. discipline overemphasized physical education, while other aspects of discipline research were overly emphasized. It reflects that the knowledge structure of the original division of discipline system was biased and incompatible, and its leading role in other fields of physical education was limited. The research held that the reconstruction of second level discipline of sports was based on the practice of physical education, which could be divided into physical education, physical fitness, sports competition and recreational sports. It was also necessary to build the third level discipline through deep expression and dimension reduction expression.
作者
徐丹
陆作生
XU Dan;LU Zuosheng(School of P.E., South China Normal Univ., Guangzhou 510006, China;School of P.E., Nanchang Univ., Nanchang 330031, China)
出处
《武汉体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期68-75,共8页
Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(18FTY002)
江西省教育科学"十三五"规划项目(18YB009)
江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(TY18119)
关键词
体育学科
二级学科
三级学科
关键词
聚类
sports related discipline
second level discipline
thirdlevel discipline
key word
clustering