期刊文献+

NRS2002、SGA和MNA-SF评估2型糖尿病住院病人营养状况的结果比较 被引量:28

Comparison of NRS2002,SGA and MNA-SF in assessing nutritional status quo of inpatients with type 2 diabetes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]应用营养风险筛查2002 (NRS2002)、主观全面评价(SGA)和简易营养评价精法(MNA-SF)评价2型糖尿病住院病人营养状况,并对结果进行分析。[方法]采用连续定点抽样收集病人一般信息,应用NRS2002和SGA对537例2型糖尿病住院病人进行营养筛查或评估,MNA-SF对其中188例老年2型糖尿病住院病人进行营养评估;并进行人体测量和血生化指标检测,分析3种营养评估方法的相关影响因素。[结果]老年2型糖尿病病人与中年2型糖尿病病人比较,身高、总胆固醇(TC)、血红蛋白(HB)均降低(P<0.05),而尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)增加明显(P<0.05);男性老年2型糖尿病病人体重、清蛋白(ALB)、总蛋白(TP)、三酰甘油(TG)降低明显(P<0.05),而女性老年2型糖尿病病人小腿围(LC)明显降低(P<0.05)。依据体质指数(BMI)判断标准,2型糖尿病住院病人营养不良、超重及肥胖的构成比分别为3.0%、42.7%、21.4%;根据SGA评估结果,营养不良的病人占9.9%;依据NRS2002,存在营养风险的病人占16.8%;根据MNA-SF评估,存在营养不良的病人占19.7%;Spearman相关分析显示:2型糖尿病住院病人人群中,NRS2002、SGA及MNA-SF评分之间呈正相关(P<0.05);男性和女性2型糖尿病住院病人NRS2002、SGA和MNA-SF均与体重、BMI、腰围(WC)、LC呈正相关(P<0.05)。[结论]2型糖尿病人中超重和肥胖人群比例较高,应用NRS2002、SGA和MNA-SF营养筛查或评估时应结合性别、年龄、人体测量及血生化指标进行综合评估。 Objective: To evaluate the nutritional status quo of inpatients with type 2 diabetes by using NRS2002,SGA and MNA-SF,and to analyze the results. Methods: The general information of patients was collected by continuous fixed-point sampling,and 537 inpatients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated by NRS2002 and SGA.Among them,188 elderly inpatients were assessed by MNA-SF.Human body measurements and blood biochemical indexes were performed to analyze the relevant influencing factors of the three nutrition assessment methods. Results: Compared with middle-aged type 2 diabetes inpatients,the height,TC and HB of elderly type 2 diabetes patients were all decreased( P <0.05), while BUN and Cr were significantly increased( P <0.05).Body weight,ALB,TP and TG decreased significantly in elderly male patients ( P <0.05),while LC decreased significantly in elderly female patients( P <0.05).According to BMI criteria,the proportions of malnutrition,overweight and obesity was 3.0%,42.7% and 21.4% respectively.According to the SGA assessment,the proportion of malnutrition was 9.9%.According to NRS2002,the composition ratio of nutritional risk was 16.8%.According to the MNA-SF assessment,the constituent ratio of malnutrition was 19.7%.Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between NRS2002,SGA and MNA-SF( P <0.05).NRS2002,SGA and MNA-SF were positively correlated with body weight,BMI,WC and LC in both male and female inpatients with type 2 diabetes( P <0.05). Conclusion: Type 2 diabetes patients had a higher proportion of overweight and obesity,and NRS2002,SGA and MNA-SF should be combined with gender,age,anthropometric measurement and blood biochemical indexes for comprehensive evaluation.
作者 李艳荣 孟俊华 张新胜 胡颖 王超 马娇娇 刘秀冬 LI Yanrong;MENG Junhua;ZHANG Xinsheng;HU Ying;WANG Chao;MAJiaojiao;LIU Xiudong(Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2019年第10期1697-1701,共5页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金项目 编号:2016FC-ZHCG-2001
关键词 营养风险筛查2002 主观全面评价 简易营养评价精法 2型糖尿病 营养状况 营养不良 影响因素 体质指数 Nutritional Risk Screening 2002,NRS2002 Subjective GeneralAssessment,SGA Short form Mini Nutritional Assessment,MNA-SF type 2diabetes nutritional status malnutrition influencing factors BMI
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献51

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:214
  • 2张红叶,杨军,周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,陶寿淇.我国十组人群脑卒中危险因素的前瞻性研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1996,4(4):150-152. 被引量:91
  • 3Bistrian B, Blackburn G, Vitale J, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients [J]. JAMA, 1976, 235(4): 1567-1570.
  • 4Fettes SB, Davidson HIM, Richardoson RA, et al. Nutritional status of elective gastrointestinal surgery patients preand post-operatively [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2002, 21 (3):249- 251.
  • 5Waitzberg DL, Caiaffa WT, Correia MITD. Hospital malnutrition: the Brazilian national survey (IBRANUTRI): a study of 4000 patients [ J]. Nutrition, 2001, 17 (7-8) : 573 -580.
  • 6Kruizenga HM, Wierdsma NJ, Van Bokhorst MAE, et al. Screening of nutritional status in the Netherlands [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(2) : 147-152.
  • 7Gazzotti C, Albert A, Pepinster A, et al. Clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) scale in geriatric medicine [J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2000, 4 (3) : 176- 181.
  • 8American Dietetic Association. Identifying patients at risk: ADA's definitions for nutrition screening and nutrition assessment [J]. J Am Diet Assoc, 1994, 94(8) :838-839.
  • 9ASPEN. Board of directors. Definition of terms used in ASPEN. Guidelines and Standards [J]. Nutr Clin Pract, 1995, 10(1) :1-3.
  • 10Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002 [J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(4):415- 421.

共引文献10014

同被引文献336

引证文献28

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部