期刊文献+

腹直肌阻滞麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在斜疝手术中的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the effects of rectus abdominis block anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in indirect hernia surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹直肌阻滞麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在成人腹股沟斜疝手术中的临床疗效。方法以我院2017年2~12月收治的拟行腹股沟斜疝成人患者80例为研究对象,并随机分为腹直肌阻滞麻醉组(观察组)与腰硬联合麻醉组(对照组),各40例。比较两组麻醉效果,两组患者在麻醉后5min、10min,切皮后5min,手术结束前,术后2h围术期平均动脉压、心率的变化及患者围术期血流动力学变化、术后并发症等情况。结果两组麻醉效果比较,观察组麻醉优良率为90.0%,对照组麻醉优良率为87.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者围术期平均动脉压、心率组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组麻醉后10min患者平均动脉压为(91.1±13.2)mmHg,心率为(92.2±8.3)次/min,对照组麻醉后10min患者平均动脉压为(73.4±16.6)mmHg,心率(76.3±14.2)次/min,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组麻醉并发症发生率为2.5%,对照组麻醉并发症发生率为30.0%,两组比较差异统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下腹直肌阻滞在成人腹股沟斜疝手术麻醉中效果确切,围术期血流动力学稳定,术后并发症少。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of abdominal rectus block anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in adult inguinal hernia surgery. Methods 80 cases of adult patients with inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital from February to December in 2017 were randomLy divided into the abdominal rectus block anesthesia group(observation group) and the combined spinal and epidural anesthesia group (control group), 40 cases in each group. The anesthetic effects of the two groups were observed and compared. The perioperative mean arterial pressure, heart rate changes, and perioperative hemodynamic changes were observed at 5 minutes after anesthesia, 10 minutes after anesthesia, 5 minutes after skin incision, end of the operation, and 2 hours after surgery were compared. The complications were also observed. Results In terms of anesthetic effect, the excellent and good rate of anesthesia was 90.0% in the observation group and 87.5% in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate between the two groups(P>0.05). The average arterial pressure was (91.1±13.2)mmHg and the heart rate was (92.2±8.3)bpm in the observation group 10 minutes after anesthesia. The mean arterial pressure of the control group was(73.4±16.6)mmHg and the heart rate was (76.3±14.2) bpm 10 minutes after anesthesia. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 2.5% in the observation group and 30.0% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided rectus abdominis blockade is effective in anesthesia for adult inguinal hernia. Perioperative hemodynamics are stable and postoperative complications are few.
作者 刘磊 郭尔萍 LIU Lei;GUO Erping(Department of Anesthesiology,Qianjiang Hospital,People's Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 433199,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2019年第11期136-139,共4页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 超声引导 腹直肌阻滞 腰硬联合 腹股沟斜疝手术 Ultrasound guidance Rectus abdominis block Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia Inguinal hernia surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1陈运兵.腹股沟疝气的不同手术治疗方式效果探析[J].现代养生,2014,0(8):158-159. 被引量:4
  • 2谢柏樟.麻醉科主治医师500问.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社.2001.
  • 3Duty B,Okhunov Z, Smith A, et al. The debate over per- cutaneous nephrolitbotomy positioning: a comprehensive review[J]. J Urol,2011,186(1) :20-25.
  • 4Chen S,Zhu L,Yang S,et al. High-vs low-power Holmi- um laser lithotripsy.-a prosPective, randomized study in patients undergoing multitract minipercutaneous nephro- lithotomy[J]. Urology,2012,79(2) ,293-297.
  • 5Li R, Louie MK, Lee HJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of three different methods of nephrostomy tract clo- sure after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy [J]. BJU Int, 2011.107(10) ,1660-1665.
  • 6Elkoushy MA, Shahrour W, Andonian S. Pulsed fluoros- copy in ureteroseopy and pereutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. Urology,2012,79 (6) :1230-1235.
  • 7Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, et al. Ureteroseopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a new technique for percutane- ous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)[J]. BJU Int,2012,110(4) 588-59O.
  • 8Ronald D, Miller MD. Miller anesthesia[M]. Fifth Edi- tion. London : Churchill Livingstone, 2000 : 1935.
  • 9Movasseghi G, Hassani V, Mohaghegh MR, et al. Com- parison between spinal and general anesthesia in percuta- neous nephrolithotomy[J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2013,4 (1) : e13871.
  • 10Gonen M,Basaran B. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolitho- tomy:spinal versus general anesthesia[J]. Urol J, 2014, ll (1) : 1211-1215.

共引文献106

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部