关节镜微创技术在治疗膝关节骨创伤中的效果

Effect of Arthroscopic Minimally Invasive Technique in the Treatment of Knee Bone Trauma

目的分析膝关节骨创伤采用关节镜微创技术治疗的临床疗效。方法 2017年1月—2018年8月,于我院收治的膝关节骨创伤患者中选取85例,随机分为两组,对照组患者42例,采用常规治疗方式进行治疗,观察组患者43例,采用关节镜微创技术治疗,对比两组临床疗效、膝关节功能以及疼痛情况。结果观察组治疗优良率为97.67%,明显高于对照组的76.19%,组间差异明显(χ~2=8.704 4,P <0.05);观察组治疗后膝关节HSS评分为(78.96±6.36)分,高于对照组的(62.36±3.16)分,组间差异明显(t=15.182 1,P <0.05);观察组治疗后VAS评分为(1.26±0.12)分,低于对照组的(3.16±0.52)分,组间差异明显(t=12.632 9,P <0.05)。结论膝关节骨创伤采用关节镜微创技术治疗的临床疗效显著,能有效改善患者膝关节功能,减轻疼痛,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of knee bone trauma. Methods From January 2017 to August 2018, 85 patients with knee trauma were enrolled in our hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups. 42 patients in the control group were treated with conventional treatment. 43 patients were in the observation group. The arthroscopic minimally invasive technique was used to compare the clinical efficacy, knee function and pain of the two groups. Results The excellent and good rate of observation group was 97.67%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (76.19%). The difference between the two groups was obvious(χ 2=8.704 4, P < 0.05). The knee joint HSS score of the observation group was (78.96±6.36), higher than in the control group (62.36±3.16), the difference between the groups was significant (t =15.182 1, P < 0.05);the VAS score of the observation group after treatment was (1.26±0.12), which was lower than that of the control group (3.16±0.52). The difference was significant(t =12.632 9, P < 0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of knee arthroplasty with arthroscopic minimally invasive technique is significant, which can effectively improve knee function and relieve pain. It is worth promoting.