期刊文献+

日本职务发明制度:演进、革新和启示 被引量:7

The Employee Invention System in Japan: Evolution, Reform and Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 日本自1921年以来的职务发明制度一直偏重保护发明人利益。2015年专利法修改从根本上对职务发明制度进行调整,通过选择性的雇主原始归属原则和灵活的发明人奖励制度赋予企业更多自主权。在发明人奖励方面,2015年法继承和发展了程序重视的理念。在当前企业创新环境和研发模式发生重大变化的背景下,日本职务发明制度的发展和变革对我国有重要启示。法律必须对职务发明问题保持一定程度的介入;避免"雇主雇员二分对立"式思想,采取灵活的职务发明制度设计,赋予企业更多的自主权;注重从程序上规范发明人奖励报酬的支付;明确法院计算奖励报酬具体数额时应考虑的因素。 Since 1921, the employee invention system in Japan has been paying more attention to the inventors’ interests. The 2015 amendment to the Japanese Patent Act involves a drastic revision to the employee invention system under which employers are given more freedom and autonomy. The right to obtain a patent for an employee invention can be originally vested in the employer if there is such an agreement in advance. The employer can adopt a more flexible inventor reward scheme than before. Regarding the inventor reward, the 2015 Patent Act carried on and further developed the idea of valuing the paying process. In the context of signi ficant changes in the R & D models and innovation environment for enterprises, there are important implications for the revision and improvement of the employee invention system of China. Firstly, the law should not leave the matter completely to be subject to the hand of free market. Secondly, instead of the dichotomy between the employer and the employee, the employee invention system should maintain flexibility so that enterprises can have more managerial autonomy. Thirdly, regarding the legal regulation of the inventor reward, more emphasis should be laid on the due process of the payment. Finally, the factors for consideration in calculating the amount of the inventor reward in the judicial process should be specified.
作者 李洁琼 Li Jieqiong
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期83-94,共12页 Intellectual Property
关键词 日本 专利法 职务发明制度 选择性的雇主原始归属 程序重视 Japan Patent Act employee invention system selective employer ascription emphasis on procedural matters
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1王爱君.是按所有权分配还是按贡献分配——与《究竟是按所有权分配还是按贡献分配?》一文商榷[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):16-21. 被引量:8
  • 2《德国专利法》第6条.
  • 3《美国专利法》第115条.
  • 4[美]安守廉著:《窃书为雅罪》,李琛译,法律出版社2010年版,第77页.
  • 5Catherine L. Fisk, Removing the "Fuel of Interest" from the "Fire of Genius" : Law and the Employee-Inventor, 1830-1930, 65 The University of Chicago Law Review 1127, 1147-58 (1998).
  • 6Ann Bartow, Inventors of the World, Unite-A Call for Collective Action by Employee-Inventors, 37 Santa Clara Law Review 673(1997).
  • 7Robert P. Merges, The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions, 13 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1, 14(1999).
  • 8Steven Cherensky, A Penny for Their Thoughts: Employee-Inventors, Preinvention Assignment Agreements, Property, and Personhood, 81 California Law Review 595 (1993).
  • 9Htdse v. Bonsack Machine Co., 65 F 864, 868(4th Cir 1895).
  • 10Startford v. Roche, 131 S. Ct. 2188(2011).

共引文献21

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部