我国体育纠纷解决“或裁或审”制度研究

A study of the “arbitration or litigation” sports dispute settlement system in China

中国体育法治建设中一项至关重要的任务就是建立起包括调解、仲裁、诉讼在内的多元体育纠纷解决体系。运用文献资料研究、比较、案例分析等方法,对《体育法》第三十三条没有落实所造成的当前我国体育纠纷解决困境进行分析,重点对我国体育纠纷解决制度建立的目标、制度安排进行论证。研究认为,建立多元、开放、高效、公正,尊重各纠纷主体选择权的多元化体育纠纷解决体系是新时代我国体育纠纷解决制度建设的目标;在“只审不裁”“只裁不审”“先裁后审”“或裁或审”4种纠纷解决制度安排中,“或裁或审”机制应该成为首先方案。

A crucial task in Chinese sports legal governance construction is to establish a mediation,arbitration and litigation included multifunctional sports dispute settlement system.By applying methods such as literature data study,comparison and case analysis,the authors analyzed the current Chinese sports dispute settlement predicament caused by failure to implement article 33 in the Sports Law,mainly analyzed and demonstrated the objective and system arrangements of Chinese sports dispute settlement system establishment,and drew the following conclusions:establishing a multifunctional,open,highly efficient,fair and various dispute subject options respected mul-tifunctional sports dispute settlement system is the objective of Chinese sports dispute settlement system construc-tion in the new era;among such 4 dispute settlement system arrangements as“litigation but no arbitration”,“arbitration but no litigation”,“arbitration and then litigation”and“arbitration or litigation”,the“arbitration or litigation”mechanism should become the first option.