“辨别评价”与“科学系统”的抵牾——对海外中国现代文学两种研究系统的辨析

The Collision of “Identify Evaluation” and “Scientific System”——By the Analysis of Two Kinds of Modern Chinese Literature Overseas Study System

本文以1962年因《中国现代小说史》出版引发的普实克与夏志清的论争为切入点,讨论二者所代表的两种中国现代文学研究系统的思想、审美立场和方法路径。文章从文学观念、研究方法及核心理论三个方面展开讨论,勾勒夏志清研究系统的廓形,分析夏、普的分歧点,概括20世纪下半叶海外汉学界两种中国现代文学研究系统的性质特征,及其对中国现代文学研究的影响。

C. T. Hsia published his first academic work A History of Modern Chinese Fiction in 1962. It was criticized by the Czech Sinologist Pmsek. Both of them have their own academic position and they have different thoughts, aesthetic standpoints and study methods. Each of them represents a kind of study system. This article, from the aspects of literary conception, research method and core theory, outlines the study system of C. T. Hsia', analyzes the bifurcation point, summarizes the characteristics of two kinds of modern Chinese literature overseas study system in the second half of the 20th century, and explores their influence on the study of modem Chinese literature.