期刊文献+

剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室对再生育的影响 被引量:22

Effect of scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section on reproduction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室对再生育的影响。方法选取2015年2月至2018年2月广元市中医医院分娩的82例剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室孕妇为研究对象(研究组),同期分娩的剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫孕妇64例为对照组,记录孕妇末次超声子宫下段肌层厚度、Apgar评分、新生儿窒息、孕周、产后大出血、剖宫产情况等指标,分析子宫下段异常因素。结果研究组孕妇再次剖宫产80例,经阴道成功生产2例,再次剖宫产率97.56%,对照组孕妇再次剖宫产62例,经阴道成功生产2例,再次剖宫产率96.88%(P>0.05);研究组孕妇末次超声子宫下段肌层厚度和妊娠天数均小于对照组孕妇,子宫下段异常率高于对照组孕妇,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);急诊手术率、新生儿窒息率、产后大出血率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组孕妇孕周>37周、34~36^(+6)周、<34周再次剖宫产率分别为86.25%、8.75%、3.75%,对照组孕妇相同孕周再次剖宫产率为67.74%、22.58%、9.68%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);大憩室组和小憩室组孕妇手术中子宫下段异常率分别为33.33%、19.51%,均高于对照组孕妇(12.90%)(P<0.05);憩室类型和子宫下段肌层厚度为子宫下段异常的危险因素。结论剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室患者较单纯的瘢痕子宫患者再妊娠时子宫下段异常发生率高,妊娠时间短,再次剖宫产率高。 Objective To discuss effect of scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum on production after cesarean section.Methods A total of 82 pregnant women with scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section from February 2015 to February 2018 in Guangyuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as study subjects(study group),64 cases of cicatricial uterus after cesarean section in the same period were selected as the control group.The thickness of the last ultrasound of the lower uterine segment of the uterus,Apgar score,neonatal asphyxia,gestational age,postpartum hemorrhage,cesarean section and other indicators were recorded to analyze the abnormal factors of the lower uterus.Results There were 80 cases of cesarean section in the study group,2 cases of successful vaginal production,97.56%of cesarean section again.62 cases of cesarean section in the control group,2 cases of successful vaginal production and 96.88%of cesarean section(P>0.05).The thickness of subuterine segment and the number of pregnancy days in the study group were less than those of the control group,the abnormal rate of subuterine segment was higher than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in emergency operation rate,neonatal asphyxia rate and postpartum hemorrhage rate(P>0.05).The resection rate of pregnant women after 37 weeks,34~36+6 weeks and less than 34 weeks in the study group was 86.25%,8.75%and 3.75%,respectively.The difference was statistically significant compared with the rate of 67.74%,22.58%and 9.68% of the control group at same gestational weeks(P<0.05).The abnormal rate of subuterine segment in the large diverticulum group and the small diverticulum group was 33.33%and 19.51%,respectively,which were higher than those in the control group(12.90%)(P<0.05).The diverticulum type and the thickness of the lower uterine muscle layer were risk factors for abnormalities in the lower uterus.Conclusion After cesarean section,the patients with scar uterus combined with uterine cicatricial diverticulum have higher incidence of abnormal subuterine segment,shorter pregnancy time and high rate of cesarean section than those with simple scar uterus.
作者 何秀宣 李标 程燕 HE Xiu-xuan;LI Biao;CHENG Yan(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Guang-yuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Guangyuan Sichuan 628000,P.R.China)
出处 《中国计划生育和妇产科》 2019年第5期25-28,共4页 Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology
关键词 瘢痕子宫 子宫瘢痕憩室 再妊娠 子宫下段异常 cicatricial uterus uterine scar diverticulum repregnancy abnormal uterine segment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献67

  • 1JUNKUMAKIRI,IWAHOKIKUCHI,MARIKITADE,YUKOKUMAKIRI,KEIJIKURODA,SHOZOMATSUOKA,SACHIKOTOKITA,SATORUTAKEDA.Evaluation of factors contributing to uterine scar formation after laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.2010(8)
  • 2Bij de Vaate AJ, Van der Voet LF, Naji 0,et al. Prevalence, poten-tial risk factors for development and symptoms related to the pres-ence of uterine niches following Cesarean section : systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2014,43(4) :372-382.
  • 3Naji 0,Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, et al. Standardized approachfor imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonog-raphy[j]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2012,39(3) :252-259.
  • 4Roberge S, Boutin A,Chaillet N,et al. Systematic review of cesareanscar assessment in the nonpregnant state : imaging techniques anduterine scar defect[j]. Am J perinatol,2012,29(6) :465-471.
  • 5Bij de Vaate AJ,Brolmann HA,Van der Voet LF,et al. Ultrasoundevaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and post-menstrual spotting [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011,37 (1):93-99.
  • 6Mahajan D, Kang M^SandKu MS,et al. Rare complications of cesare-an scar[j]. Indian J Radiol Imaging,2013,23(3) :258-261.
  • 7Gasim T,Al Jama FE,Rahman MS,et al. Multiple repeat cesareansections : operative difficulties, maternal complications and outcome[J]. JReprod Med,2013,58(7-8) :312-318.
  • 8Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34 ( 1 ) : 90 - 97.
  • 9Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, et al. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean sear syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean sear defect[ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2015, 41(9) : 1363 -1369.
  • 10Park WI, Jeon YM, LEE Jin - yong, et al. Subserosal pregnancy in a previous myomectomy site: a variant of intramural pregnancy [ J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2006, 13 (3) : 242 - 244.

共引文献295

同被引文献231

引证文献22

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部