期刊文献+

郭象对庄子逍遥义的改造

Guoxiang's Transformation of Zhaungzi's Xiaoyao
原文传递
导出
摘要 庄子尊"天"为至高权威,以达致"天"之"无待"境界为"逍遥",在他看来,"逍遥"始终处于"天"的权威体系中,唯"天"乃为"逍遥",舍此无可言"逍遥"。而郭象却从万物"自生"而"独化"的认知观念出发,主张万物各尽其性分即可达致"逍遥",从而否定了其中统一权威体系的存在,最终实现了对庄子"逍遥"思想的改造。是否存在应当服从的统一权威,是两种"逍遥"观念的根本分异点。 Zhuangzi believes that Heaven is the highest authority of the world, and reaching the Heaven’ s realm known as the unconditional is what Xiaoyao means.In his opinion, Xiaoyao is always in the authoritative system of Heaven,only the state of Heaven can be seen as Xiaoyao.However, Guoxiang believes that everything can achieve Xiaoyao as long as they completely fulfill their nature,because all of them are the outcome of spontaneous self-growth.This kind of thought negates the existence of the unified authority system,and whether there is a unified authority in it,is the essential difference between Zhaungzi’s Xiaoyao and Guoxiang’s Xiaoyao.
作者 熊忭 Xiong Bian
出处 《理论界》 2019年第3期24-29,共6页 Theory Horizon
关键词 庄子 郭象 逍遥 Zhuangzi Guoxiang Xiaoyao
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献7

  • 1郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1961..
  • 2刘笑敢.《经典诠释中的两种内在定向及其外化—以王弼《老子注》与郭象《庄子注》为例》[J].中国文哲研究所集刊,2005:287-319.
  • 3柏林.自由四论[M].陈晓林,译.台北;联经出版公司,1977.
  • 4Abrahanm H. Maslow,Religions, Values, and Peak- Experiences (Columbus : Ohio State University Press, 1964) p. 28.
  • 5Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature (New York: Arkanna, 1993), Motivation and Per-sonality (2nd edition)(New York: Haper & Row, 1970).
  • 6《南华真经疏序》,曹础基,黄兰发整理.《庄子注疏》,北京.中华书局,2011年,第2页.
  • 7氏著.《陶渊明之思想与清谈之关系》,《陈寅恪史学论文选集》,第119页.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部