期刊文献+

单中心连续280例微创Mckeown术治疗食管癌经验 被引量:3

A Single center experience in the treatment of esophageal cancer with 280 cases of minimally invasive mckeown
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析胸腹腔镜联合下经右胸-上腹-左颈三切口(微创Mckeown)食管癌根治术的临床治疗的可行性及安全性。方法连续纳入本中心2014年1月至2017年10月280例微创Mckeown术食管癌患者的临床资料为研究对象,按手术开展时间先后平均分为4组,其中第三、第四组采用术后早期经口进食加速康复外科管理模式。收集4组患者围手术期临床资料,并随访至2018年10月。组间比较采用χ~2检验。结果纳入研究的280例患者中,完成微创Mckeown术257例,完成率91.79%。四组患者手术时间、术中出血、术中中转开胸或开腹率逐步下降,P<0.05。淋巴结清扫站数及枚数上,组间比较,无统计学差异,P>0.05。术后胸管引流量、引流时间、术后住院日呈现下降趋势,有统计学差异,P<0.05。术后总住院费用逐步升高,四组患者比较,有统计学差异,P<0.05。术后并发肺部感染、术后出现声嘶、吻合口瘘逐渐减少,P<0.05。全组患者围手术期死亡3例,非计划出院7例,平均随访时间(17±10)个月。随访期间丢失样本71例,随访率74.64%,随访期间87例局部复发,53例死亡。全组患者12m无瘤生存率(DFS)为73.5%,12m年总体生存率(OS)为80.3%。结论经过严格学习曲线学习,有序开展微创Mckeown手术及术后早期经口进食加速康复外科管理安全可行,微创Mckeown手术短期随访效果良好。 Objective To analyze the feasibility and safety of thoracic laparoscopic combined with minimally invasive Mckeown for esophageal cancer. Methods Studied the clinical data of 280 patients with minimally invasive Mckeown esophageal cancer from January 2014 to October 2017 in our medical center. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the operation time. The third and fourth groups were used accelerated rehabilitation surgery management. These patients followed up until October 2018. The χ~2 test was used for comparison between groups. Results 257 of the 280 patients had completed minimally invasive Mckeown,with a completion rate of 91.79%. The operation time,intraoperative hemorrhage,intraoperative transfer or open laparotomy rate of the four groups were gradually decreased,and there were statistical differences,P<0.05. There were no statistical differences in the lymph node dissection in the four groups,P >0.05. Postoperative chest drainage,drainage time,and postoperative hospital stay showed a downward trend,P<0.05. The total hospitalization cost increased gradually after surgery,P<0.05. Postoperative pulmonary infection,postoperative hoarseness,and anastomotic leakage were gradually reduced,with statistical significance,P<0.05. 3 people died during the perioperative period,and the average follow-up time was 17±10 m. 71 patients were lost during the follow-up period,the follow-up rate was 74.64%. During the follow-up period,87 patients had local recurrence and 53 patients died. The 12 m disease free survival(DFS) was 73.5% and the overall survival rate(OS) was 80.3%. Conclusion After a rigorous learning curve learning,it is safe and feasible to carry out minimally invasive Mckeown surgery and early postoperative oral feeding accelerated surgical management. The short-term follow-up of minimally invasive Mckeown surgery is effective.
作者 何海权 林万里 张海 陈颖 吴波猛 龚兰娟 周林荣 HE Hai-quan;LIN Wanli;ZHANG Hai(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Gaozhou People's Hospital,Gaozhou 525200,China)
出处 《江西医药》 CAS 2019年第4期301-303,315,共4页 Jiangxi Medical Journal
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目,编号A2017593
关键词 食管肿瘤 食管切除术 微创外科 生存分析 Esophageal malignancy Esophagectomy Minimally invasive surgery Survival analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimal- ly invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg, 2012,256:95-103.
  • 2Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lan- cet,2012,379 : 1887-1892.
  • 3Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2011,12:366-369.
  • 4Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H, et al. Thoracolaparoscopie esophagecto- my: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus posi- tion?. J Am Coil Surg,2012,214:838-844.
  • 5Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, et al. Comparison of the short-term quali- ty of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagecto-my via video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Dis Esophagus, 2010,23:408-414.
  • 6Feng MX, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagec- tomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance. Surg Endosc,2012, 26 : 1573-1578.
  • 7Shen Y, Zhang Y, Tan L, et al. Extensive mediastinal lymphade- nectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy: optimal results from a single center. J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16:715-721.
  • 8Wang H, Tan L, Fang M, et al. Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally inva- sive esophagectomy. Qual Life Res ,2011,20 : 179-189.
  • 9Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally in- vasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and.associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg,2010,252 : 292 -298.
  • 10Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esoph- agectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16:486- 494.

共引文献98

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部