期刊文献+

流畅性对审美鉴赏的影响——从加工流畅性模型到审美愉悦与兴趣模型 被引量:4

Aesthetic Appreciation and Fluency: From the Fluency Theory to the PIA Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加工审美对象的流畅性是否对审美反应产生影响,一直存在争议。加工流畅性模型主张流畅性直接引发积极情绪,积极情绪是影响审美判断的决定性因素。而审美愉悦与兴趣模型主张加工动机决定加工水平,并导致不同的审美反应。厘清流畅性与不同审美反应间的关系,分析不同水平的加工的作用,有助于进一步完善审美加工模型。未来应关注审美需求以及不同审美对象,并结合神经美学的方法,发展和完善审美加工理论框架。 Whether the fluency of processing aesthetic objects has an impact on the aesthetic reaction is controversial. The fluency theory of aesthetic advocates that fluency directly leads to positive emotions, and positive emotions are the decisive factors affecting the aesthetic judgment. The Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking advocates that processing motivation determines the level of processing, and leads to different aesthetic reactions. We clarified the relationship between fluency and different aesthetic responses, and analyzed the roles of different aesthetic responses in different levels of processing, which was conducive to further improve the model of aesthetic processing. The future research should focus on the aesthetic needs and different aesthetic objects, and combine the methods of neural aesthetics to develop and improve the theoretical framework of aesthetic processing.
作者 何先友 陈雅珏 杨丹妮 何德娴 HE Xian-you;CHEN Ya-jue;YANG Dan-ni;HE De-xian
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期71-76,192,共7页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"具身的美与赋予的美:来自汉字字形审美的行为与f MRI实验证据"(31671132)
关键词 加工流畅性模型 审美愉悦与兴趣模型 流畅性 加工水平 the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking fluency the level of processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1[3]康德.判断力批判[M].邓晓芒译,杨祖陶校.北京:人民出版社,2004.
  • 2Alter, A. L. , & Oppenheimer, D. M. ( 2009 ). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and So- cial Psychology Review,13,219 - 235.
  • 3Armstrong, T. , & Detweiler - Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an e- motion:The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology,12 (4) ,305 - 329.
  • 4Bacci,F. ,& Melcber,D. (2011). Art and the senses(Vol. 52). Oxford University Press.
  • 5Bargh,J. A. (2013). Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychology Press.
  • 6Baumgarten,A. G. (1735/1954). Reflections on poetry. Berke- ley:University of California Press.
  • 7Belke,B. , Leder, H. , Strobach, T. , & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High - level processing dynamics in art ap- preciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4 (4) ,214 - 222.
  • 8Bourdieu,P. ( 2013 ). Distinction : A social critique of the judge- ment of taste. New York: Routledge.
  • 9Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho -historical framework for the sci- ence of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), 123 - 137.
  • 10Chatterjee, A. , Widick, P. , Stemschein, R. , Smith, W. B. , & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Em- pirical Studies of the Arts,28( 2 ) ,207 - 222.

共引文献11

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部