摘要
行政权力清单制度改革主要借助行政行为类型化技术对行政权力加以梳理和归类。行政行为类型化技术是一种法教义学意义上的法律方法,在社会事务复杂、行政环境多样的背景下,此种方法的适用造成权力清单难以穷尽行政执法所需的全部权力和展现权力运行的整体过程,以此划分的权力类型与实然状态的权力之间也缺乏一一对应的关系。在这项改革的已有成果基础上,行政权力清单制度改革有必要引入行政过程论范式,行政过程论借助“行政过程”这一载体及其全面、动态的方法,能够更为真实地反映行政权力运作的具体过程。据此,清单梳理需对接行政组织法,细化“三定”方案;区分规制性过程和给付性过程,借助服务清单规范“其他权力”;衔接各类权力,绘制行政流程示意图。
The reform of administrative power list is to sort out and categorize administrative power mainly by means of the technique of categorizing administrative behaviors. The technique of categorizing administrative behaviors is a legal method in the sense of legal dogmatics. In the context of complex social affairs and diversified administrative environment, the adoption of such method make it hard for the power list to exhaust all power necessary for administrative law enforcement and exhibit the whole process of power operation, and there is a lack of one-to-one correspondence between types of power categorized and the power in actual state. It is necessary to introduce the pattern of the administrative process theory into the reform on basis of existing achievements. The administrative process theory can reflect the detailed process of administrative power operation in a more real way by means of administrative process and its overall and dynamic method. Thus, lists should be sorted out in accordance with administrative organization law to refine the "three decisions" scheme;the regulatory process and the benefit-rendering process should be distinguished to regulate "other power" by the service list;various types of power should be connected and administrative flowcharts should be drafted.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期26-39,共14页
Political Science and Law
基金
2018年国家社科基金后期资助项目“行政法教义学:原理、技术及其变迁研究”(项目编号:18FFX049)的阶段性成果
关键词
权力清单
行政行为类型化
法教义学
法律方法
行政过程
Power List
Categorizing Administrative Behaviors
Legal Dogmatics
Legal Method
Administrative Process