期刊文献+

射频消融联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗直径3cm以上原发性肝癌的疗效和影响因素分析 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价射频消融(RFA)联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗直径3~10 cm原发性肝癌(HCC)的疗效,并分析其影响因素。方法收集TACE术后行序贯RFA治疗的HCC患者共124例,主要终点为总生存期(OS),次要终点为中位无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。采用单因素Cox回归分析进行统计分析,并进一步通过多元Cox比例风险回归分析。结果术后1~6年的PFS分别为43.2%、31.1%、18.0%、12.6%、9.5%和9.5%,平均9.13个月;术后1~6年的OS率分别为76.2%、57.9%,37.1%、21.5%、16.4%和10.9%,平均27.57个月;单因素Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤大小、TACE次数、AFP、AST、肝硬化、结节数目、是否完全消融和有无HBV感染都是不利的预后因素(均P<0.2)。多变量Cox分析显示,肿瘤大小、乙型肝炎病毒感染、TACE次数、AFP及AST是独立的预后因素风险(均P<0.05)。单因素Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤大小、TACE次数、AFP、AST、肝硬化和有无HBV感染是不利的预后因素(均P<0.2)。多变量Cox分析显示,乙型肝炎病毒感染、TACE次数、AFP和AST是独立的不利预后因素(均P<0.05)。结论对中、大直径肝癌患者采用TACE和RFA联合治疗可以延缓肝癌进展,改善PFS和OS。肿瘤大小、TACE次数、AFP及AST水平是长期生存的独立的不利预后因素。
出处 《现代实用医学》 2019年第5期590-592,648,共4页 Modern Practical Medicine
基金 浙江省自然科学基金(LY17E0450011) 宁波市科技惠民富民项目(20105C50025) 浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2019331576)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1Wan-Yee Lau,Eric C.H.Lai,Stephanie H.Y.Lau.The current role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant/chemoprevention therapy in partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:a systematic review[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2009,8(2):124-133. 被引量:24
  • 2Choi C, Koom WS, Kim TH, et al. A Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Study for the Efficacy of Radiation Therapy Fol- lowing Incomplete Transarterial Chemoembolization in Unre- sectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma EJ~. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2014, 90(5): 1051-1060.
  • 3Cruz JE, Saksena R, Jabbour SK, et al. The power of genes: a case of unusually severe systemic toxicity after localized hepatic chemoembolization with irinotecan eluted microspheres for me- tastatic colon cancer [J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2014, 48 (12)1646 -1650.
  • 4Tang YL, Qi XS, Guo XZ. Hepatic Resection after Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemo- embolization Alone for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carci- noma: A Meta analysis of Observational Studies [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2015, 16(17) :7871-7874.
  • 5Hammond JS, Franko J, Holloway SE, et al. Gemcitabine tran- scatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocel- lular carcinoma [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61 (133) : 1339-1343.
  • 6Butros SR, Shenoy Bhangle A, Mueller PR, et al. Radiofre quency ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: feasability, local tumor control, and long-term outcome [J]. Clin Imaging, 2014, 38(4): 490-494.
  • 7Casaccia M, Santori G, Bottino G, et al. The procedure out- come of laparoscopic resection for 'small" hepatocellular carcino- ma is comparable to vlaparoscopic radiofrequency ablation [J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2015, 11(4):231-235.
  • 8Dong S, Kong J, Kong F, et al. Sorafenib suppresses the epi thelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma ceils after insufficient radiofrequency ablation [J]. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15(1):939.
  • 9Correa-Gallego C, Fong Y, Gonen M, et al. A retrospective comparison of microwave ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation for colorectal ca:ncerhepatie metastases [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(13): 4278 4283.
  • 10Tsuchiya K, Asahina Y, Tamaki N, et al. Risk factors for ex- ceeding the Milan criteria after successful radiofrequency abla- tion in patients with early-stage hepatocelIular carcinoma [J]. laver Transpl, 2014, 20(3): 291-297.

共引文献909

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部