期刊文献+

损失情境下社会困境中的合作行为 被引量:4

Cooperation in Social Dilemmas in Loss Context
下载PDF
导出
摘要 既往社会困境的研究表明,人们能够做出牺牲个人利益而维护他人或集体利益的亲社会合作行为,且这种合作行为表现出一定的直觉自动性特点。然而,既往研究中的社会困境往往置于正向的收益情境中,本研究在经典公共物品困境与公共资源困境的基础上,通过操纵个体利益与集体利益冲突标的的效价,设置出损失情境下的公共物品困境与公共资源困境,系统探究了个体在损失情境下社会困境中的亲社会合作行为及其特点。结果发现,即使是在损失情境下的社会困境任务中,被试依然表现出了较高的合作行为水平,但较收益情境下合作水平略低;此外,损失情境下的合作行为同样表现出直觉自动性的特点。本研究为社会困境中合作行为的广泛存在及其直觉自动性特点提供了新的证据。 Previous studies have revealed that people were willing to sacrifice personal interests to keep cooperation in social dilemmas,and this prosocially cooperative behavior seemed to be an intuitive response.However,social dilemmas in previous studies were often in the gain context,in which people have to decide whether or not to reduce individual gains in order that others or group get more gains.Based on classic social dilemmas tasks,this study sought to investigate cooperative behavior and its characteristic in social dilemmas in the loss context.We found that participants showed higher level of cooperative behavior in both contexts,and they cooperated more in the gain context than in the loss context;in addition,time stress upgraded the level of prosocially cooperative behavior in both contexts.These findings added new evidence to the argument that prosocially cooperative behavior in social dilemmas was widespread and it was an intuitive response.
作者 凌晓丽 孙鹏 LING Xiaoli;SUN Peng(School of Psychology,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250358;Mental Health Education and Research Center,Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Jinan 250014)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期377-383,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC190020)
关键词 社会困境 合作 收益情境 损失情境 social dilemmas cooperation gain loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献85

  • 1Kollock P.Social Dilemmas:The Anatomy of Cooperation.Annual Review of Sociology,1998,24:183~214
  • 2Steg,L.Motives and behaviour in social dilemmas relevant to the environment.In:L Hendrickx,W Jager,L Steg (Eds.).Human Decision Making and Environmental Perception.Understanding and Assisting Human Decision Making in Real-Life Settings,Groningen:University of Groningen,2003.83~102
  • 3Hardin G.The Tragedy of the Commons.Science,1968,162:1243~1248
  • 4Biel A,Garling T.The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas.Journal of Environmental Psychology,1995,15:221~233
  • 5Li S,Taplin J E,Zhang Y.The equate-to-differentiat's way of seeing the prisoner's dilemma.Information Sciences,2007,177(6):1395~1412
  • 6Beggan J K,Messick D M,Allison S T.Social Values and Egocentric Bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,55(4):606~611
  • 7Weber J M,Kopelman S,Messick D M.A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas:Applying a Logic of Appropriateness.Personality and Social Psychology Review,2004,8(3):281~307
  • 8Orbell J,Dawes R,Schwartz-Shea P.Trust,social categories,and individuals:The case of gender.Motivation and Emotion,1994,18(2):109~128
  • 9De Cremer D,Van Vugt M.Social identification effects in social dilemmas:a transformation of motives.European Journal of Social Psychology,1999,29:871~893
  • 10De Cremer D,Leonardelli G J.Cooperation in Social Dilemmas and the Need to Belong:The moderating effect of group size.Group Dynamics:Theory,Research,and Practice,2003,7(2):168~174

共引文献54

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部