期刊文献+

终末期患者与家属治疗决策一致性研究 被引量:13

Consistency on end-of-life decision-making in terminal-stage patients and their families
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解终末期患者和家属治疗决策意向的一致性。方法采用方便抽样法,抽取南充市2所三级甲等医院终末期患者及家属268对,应用自行设计的终末期治疗决策意愿调查表分别进行调查。结果终末期患者与家属在"患者参与制定治疗决策"、"以提高生活质量为目的的姑息治疗"决策一致性为69.03%、74.63%(Kappa值分别为0.529、0.530,均P<0.01);其余4项决策一致性为32.84%~47.39%(Kappa值为0.080~0.210;P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论终末期患者与家属治疗决策意向存在差异,家属的治疗决策无法完全体现患者真实意愿。 Objective To determine the consistency on end-of-life decision-making in terminal-stage patients and their families. Methods A total of 268 pairs of terminal-stage patients and their families were selected from 2 tertiary hospitals in Nanchong using convenience sampling and were asked to complete a self-designed questionnaire regarding end-of-life decision-making intentions separately. Results The consistency on "patient participation in making treatment decision" and "palliative treatment for improving quality of life" was 69.03% and 74.63% respectively, with Kappa values being 0.529 and 0.530(P<0.01 for both). The consistency on the rest 4 decisions ranged from 32.84% to 47.39%, with the Kappa values being 0.080-0.210(P<0.05, P<0.01). Conclusion There is a difference in treatment decisions between terminal-stage patients and their families. Treatment decisions made by family members cannot fully reflect desire of patients.
作者 高茜 胡建萍 何东梅 梁兰 Gao Qian;Hu Jianping;He Dongmei;Liang Lan(Nursing School of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期80-83,共4页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 南充市社会科学研究"十三五"规划2017年度项目(NC2017C066) 川北医学院附属医院2017年度院级科研发展计划项目
关键词 终末期 家属 治疗决策 一致性 姑息护理 预先指示 临终护理 terminal-stage family caregiver medical decision-making consistency palliative care advance directive end-of-life care
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1刘向晖.护理程序在临终病人心理护理中的应用[J].医学临床研究,2005,22(6):860-861. 被引量:2
  • 2彭美慈,汪国成,戴乐群,陈基乐,陈满辉.香港市民和护士对预前指示及末期病患者采用维持生命治疗看法的调查研究[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(3):11-15. 被引量:10
  • 3WatsonMS,LucasCF,HoyAM,et al.牛津临床姑息治疗手册[M].任军,马力文,主译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
  • 4陈天艳,何英利,赵英仁.试论生命维持治疗中的伦理学问题[J].中国医学伦理学,2007,20(6):54-55. 被引量:4
  • 5McCloskey E L. The Patient Self-Determination Act[J]. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1991,1(2)= 163- 169.
  • 6Robinson C, Kolesar S, Boyko M, et al. Awareness of do- not-resuscitate orders: what do patients know and want [J]. Can Fam Physician,2012,58(4) :e229-e233.
  • 7李慧玲.临终关怀指导手册[M].苏州:苏州大学出版社,2014:316.
  • 8Lindstr6m I, Gaston-Johansson F, Danielson E. Patients participation in end-of-life care: relations to different varia- bles as documented in the patients' records[J]. Palliat Sup- port Care,2010,8(3) :247-253.
  • 9Wagemans A, Van Schro]enstein Lantman-De-Valk H, Tuffrey-Wijne I, et al. End-of-life decisions: an impor- tant theme in the care for people with intellectual disabi- lities[J]. J Intell Disabil Res,2010,54(6) :516-524.
  • 10Ivo K, Younsuck K, Ho Y Y, et al. A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan[J]. J Med Ethics,2012,38(5) : 310 316.

共引文献90

同被引文献115

引证文献13

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部