期刊文献+

胃癌新辅助化疗中DOX与mFOLFOX6方案的疗效和安全性对比分析 被引量:12

Comparison and analysis of the efficacy and safety of DOX and m FOLFOX6 in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较mFOLFOX6(奥沙利铂+氟尿嘧啶)和DOX(多西他赛+奥沙利铂+卡培他滨)两种新辅助化疗方案对局部晚期胃癌患者的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2014年10月至2017年12月入住本院72例确诊为局部晚期胃癌患者,采用新辅助化疗,其中36例采用mFOLFOX6方案,36例采用DOX方案,化疗3个周期后进行临床疗效的判定并分析其不良反应。结果 mFOLFOX6组36例患者中,临床缓解率为27.8%(10/36),疾病控制率为63.9%(23/36);DOX组36例患者中,临床缓解率为36.1%(13/36),疾病控制率为75.0%(27/36),两组的近期临床疗效相比差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);mFOLFOX6组根治手术R0切除率为66.7%(24/36),DOX组为77.8%(28/36),两组患者的根治手术R0切除率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);DOX方案组呕吐、白细胞减少、血小板减少及手足综合征发生率明显高于mFOLFOX6方案组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 mFOLFOX6两药方案与DOX三药联合方案在胃癌新辅助化疗中疗效相近,但DOX方案消化道反应及血液学毒性的发生率更高。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of DOX (docetaxel + oxaliplatin + capecitabine) program with mFOLFOX6(oxaliplatin + fluorouracil) program as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients. Methods 72 patients who was diagnosed as local advanced gastric cancer in our hospital from October 2014 to December 2017, were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 36 of which were mFOLFOX6, and 36 were DOX. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy, the clinical efficacy was determined and the adverse reactions were analyzed. Results In the 36 cases of mFOLFOX6 group, the clinical remission rate was 27.8%(10/ 36), and the tumor control rate was 63.9%(23/ 36). Among the 36 patients in the DOX group, the clinical remission rate was 36.1%(13/36), and the tumor control rate was 75.0%(27/36). The recent clinical efficacy of the two groups were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). The R0 cutting rate of mFOLFOX6 group was 66.7%(24/36), and the DOX group was 77.8%(28/36). There was no statistically significant difference between the R0 cut rate of the radical operation of the two groups (both P>0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and leukocyte reduction in DOX group was significantly higher than that in the mFOLFOX6 group, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions The combination of mFOLFOX6 and DOX is similar in the treatment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer, but the incidence of gastrointestinal reaction and hematological toxicity in DOX scheme is higher.
作者 刘冀衡 曹永清 Liu Jiheng;Cao Yongqing(Department of Hematology & Oncology, the First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410005, China)
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2019年第5期715-718,共4页 Journal of Chinese Physician
关键词 胃肿瘤 化学疗法 辅助 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 Stomach neoplasms Chemotherapy, adjuvant Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Okines A, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2010,21 SuppI5:50-54. DOl: 1O.1093/annoncl mdql64.
  • 2Van Cutsem E, Boni C, TaberneroJ, et al. Randomized phase II study (GATE study) of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer[J],J Clin Oncol, 2011,29 ( Suppl15) : 4018.
  • 3Inal A, Kaplan MA, Kucukoner M, et al. Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil compared with Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of single institution[J]. Neoplasma, 2012,59(2) :233-236. DOl: 10.4149/neo_2012_030.
  • 4Kawase T, Imamura H, Gotoh M, et al. Randomized phase II study of CPT -11 versus PfX versus each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to S-1 orS-l plus CDDP[J].J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32 (Suppl) : 4064.
  • 5Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophagealJunction cancer (ToGA) : a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2010, 376(9742): 687-697.001: 10. 1016/S0140-6736( 10 )61121-X.
  • 6Ohtsu A, Shab MA , Van Cutsem E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studyJ J] .J Clin Oncol, 2011,29(30):3968-3976. 001: 10. 1200/JCO.2011.36.2236.
  • 7Wilke H, Cutsem EV, Oh SC, et al. RAINBOW: a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel versus Placebo plus Paclitaxel inthe treatment of metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma fol-lowing disease progression on first-line Platinum- andFluoropyrimidine- containing combination therapy: Results of a multiple COX regression analysis adjustingfor prognostic factorsj]].J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(Suppl): 4076.
  • 8Al-Batran SE, Cutsem EV, Oh SC, et al. Rainbow: a global, phase ill, randomized, double- blind study of Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel versus Placebo plus Paclitaxel patients with previously treated gastric or gastroesophagealJunction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Quality:oflife (QOL) results[J],J Gin Oncol, 2014, 32 (Suppl): 4058.
  • 9Fuchs CS, TomasekJ, ChoJY, et al. Regard: a phase 3 , randomized, double-blind trial of Ramucirumab (RAM) and Best Supportive Care (BSC) versus Placebo (PL) and BSC in the treatment of metastatic gastric or gastroesophagealJunction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma following disease progression (PO) on first- line Platinumandl or Fluoropyrimidine-containing combination therapy: age subgroup analysis[J].J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(Suppl): 4057.
  • 10LiJ, Qin S, XuJ, et al. Apatinib for chemotherapy-refractory advanced metastatic gastric cancer: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase II trial[J].J Clin Oncol, 2013,31(26) :3219-3225. 001: 10. 1200/JCO.2013.48.8585.

共引文献88

同被引文献135

引证文献12

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部