期刊文献+

右美托咪啶联合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术中应用的效果观察 被引量:24

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察右美托咪啶联合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞(TAP)在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果。方法选择拟行单侧腹股沟斜疝修补术的患者60例,按照随机数字表法随机分为全麻组(G组)、罗哌卡因组(R组)和罗哌卡因复合右美托咪啶组(RD组),每组20例。G组行全身麻醉喉罩插管控制呼吸,R组和RD组患者均在术前行超声引导下TAP阻滞,R组给予0.45%罗哌卡因30 ml,RD组给予0.45%罗哌卡因30 ml+右美托咪啶1 μg/kg。阻滞后两组均实行静脉全身麻醉保留自主呼吸喉罩通气。记录比较三组患者麻醉苏醒时间、拔除喉罩时间、麻醉药量、术中各时间点的平均动脉压、心率和SpO2,记录三组患者肌松满意度评分、术后镇痛药物使用情况及恶心、呕吐和嗜睡不良反应发生情况。结果 RD组患者麻醉苏醒时间、拔管时间明显短于R组与G组(P<0.05),丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼用量明显少于R组与G组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RD组患者肌松满意度评分低于G组,高于R组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。G组患者T1时点的MAP与HR均明显低于T0时点,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RD组T1-T4时点的MAP与HR均明显低于T0时点,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),RD组T2-T4时点的MAP与HR均明显低于同时点的G组。RD组术后首次追加镇痛药物的时间较R组和G组延长,追加镇痛药量较R组和G组少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组患者术后不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论罗哌卡因复合右美托咪啶TAP阻滞技术用于腹股沟疝修补,可以减少患者手术中麻醉药量,缩短复苏时间,提供较好的术后镇痛,不增加相关不良反应,在临床中可以选用。
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2019年第5期758-761,共4页 Journal of Chinese Physician
基金 徐州市推动科技创新后补助备案项目(KC16SH108)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献72

  • 1McDonnell JG,O'Donnell B,Curley G,et al.The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery:a prospective randomized controlled trial[J].Anesth Analg,2007,104(1):193-197.
  • 2Chetwood A,Agrawal S,Hrouda D,et al.Laparoscopic assistedtransversus abdominis plane block:a novel insertion technique during laparoscopic nephrectomy[J].Anaesthesia,2011,66 (4):317-318.
  • 3Bharti N,Kumar P,Bala I,et al.The efficacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery[J].Anesth Analg,2011,112 (6):1504-1508.
  • 4Young MJ,Gorlin AW,Modest VE,et al.Clinical Implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in adults[J].Anesthesiol Res Pract,2012,2012:731645.
  • 5Kadam VR,Moran JL.Epidural infusions versus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block infusions:retrospective study[J].J Anesth,2011,25(5):786-787.
  • 6Hivelin M,Wyniecki A,Plaud B,et al.Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after breast reconstruction by DIEP flap[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2011,128(1):44-55.
  • 7McMorrow RC,Ni Mhuircheartaigh R J,Ahmedet KA,et al.Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after caesarean section[J].Br J Anaesth,2011,106(5):706-712.
  • 8Bharti N,Kumar P,Bala I,et al.The effiicacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery[J].Anesth Analg,2011,112 (6):1504-1508.
  • 9B(o)rglum J,Maschmann C,Belhage B,et al.Ultrasound-guided bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block:a new four-point approach[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2011,55(6):658-663.
  • 10Niraj G,Kelkar A,Jeyapalan I,et al.Comparison of analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery[J].Anaesthesia,2011,66(6):465-471.

共引文献48

同被引文献225

引证文献24

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部