期刊文献+

论基因研究中的族群权利保护 被引量:11

The Protection of Group Rights in the Genetic Research on Human Subjects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在不断发展的人类基因研究中,由于基因的遗传相关性,对受试者个人基因信息的披露可能给整个族群带来影响,乃至导致族群的污名化,为此应加强族群权利的保护。族群的概念必须首先加以厘定,关键是在个案中甄别是否有应受保护而区别于个人权利的群体利益存在。在基因研究背景下,族群权利是一个包含基因隐私权、族群名誉权、自我决定权与惠益分享权等在内的权利束。对基因研究作出族群同意是族群权利的重要实现机制,族群同意的具体规则尚待探索。 With the continuous development of human genetic research,it is urgent to protect group rights as some genetic features are shared by all members in a group,and the disclosure of individual genetic information may have influences on the whole group,which may even lead to ethnic stigma.To strengthen the protection of ethnic group,the ethnic group as a concept must be defined clearly.The key is to find out if there is a clear boundary of group interests that are different from that of individuals and need to be protected collectively.In the context of genetic research,group rights are a bundle of rights,including the right of genetic privacy,ethnic reputation,self-determination and benefit-sharing.Group rights are realized mainly by group consent for genetic research,but the specific rules of group consent are yet to be explored.
作者 田野 TIAN Ye(Law School,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
机构地区 天津大学法学院
出处 《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期56-61,共6页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目:“人体基因检测的法律规制研究”(13CFX063)
关键词 基因研究 族群 族群权利 族群同意 genetic research ethnic group group rights group consent
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1马戎.理解民族关系的新思路——少数族群问题的“去政治化”[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,41(6):122-133. 被引量:369
  • 2[1]Soren Holm,The Role of Informed Consent in Genetic Experimentation[M] //A Companion to Genetics.Blackwell:Blackwell publishing,2004.
  • 3[2]R.Brownsword 'The Cult of Consent:Fixation and Fallacy'[J].Kings College Law Journal,2004,15(2):223.5.
  • 4[3]V Arnason.Coding and Consent:Moral Challenges of the Database Projeet in Ieeland[J].Bioethies,2004,18.
  • 5[4]Henry T.Greely,breaking the stalemate:a prospeetive regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information[J].Wake Forest L Rev.1999.34:737,758.
  • 6[5]Kathleen Liddell and Alison Hall,Beyond Bristol andAlder Hey.The Future Regulation of Human Tissue[J],13 Med.L Rev.
  • 7[2]211 N.Y.125;105 N.E.92;1914 N.Y.LEXIS 1028(1914).
  • 8[5]Robert Young,Informed consent and patient autonomy,A Companion to bioethics,edited by Helga Kuhse andPeter Singer,Blackwell publishing,441(Reprinted 2004).
  • 9[6]George J.Annas,The Nuremberg Code in U.S.Court:Ethics versus Expediency,in The Nazi Doctor And TheNuremburg Code 201,edited by George J.Annas and Michael A.Grodin,Oxford University Press(1992).
  • 10[3]http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/docs/20060426%20Patient%20Info%20Leaflet%20Final.pdf(最后到访日期:2007年9月2日).

共引文献38

同被引文献196

引证文献11

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部