期刊文献+

中文“生前预嘱”的语篇设计意图与使用反馈 被引量:6

The Chinese living will: Design rationale and user feedback
原文传递
导出
摘要 "生前预嘱"在我国是新兴语类,是人们在意识清醒时签署的指示性文件,说明自己在病危/临终时要或不要哪些医疗护理。本研究借鉴Fairclough(1992)的话语三维视角,在前期语篇结构探索基础上,考察其设计意图和使用反馈。设计者和使用者访谈发现,设计意图注重考量中国社会文化情境特征;使用者总体认可设计,但在部分结构上有不同于设计者的理解,还对预嘱的完善提出了建议。新语类的生产和使用充满不同力量的博弈,反映并建构着人们的生死观。 "Living will" is an emerging genre in China. It is a directive document signed by terminal patients when they are healthy or conscious, stating what kind of medical care they want or do not want. In light of Fairclough’s(1992) three-tier model of discourse and based on a previous study on the discourse features of the Chinese living will, this study examined the producer’s intention in the discourse design, and the users’ perceptions. Thematic analysis of interview data showed that the producer emphasized contextual features of the Chinese culture in the discourse design. The users’ perceptions were mostly congruent with that of the producer, but differed from her regarding some structural features. They also gave suggestions for improving this emerging genre.The production and consumption of the new genre is a process of negotiation between different forces,reflecting and constructing Chinese cultural values and family relations.
作者 卜晓晖 高一虹 BU Xiaohui;GAO Yihong(Huangbei Street Office,Luohu District,Shenzhen City;Peking University)
出处 《外国语言文学》 2019年第1期60-72,共13页 Foreign Language and Literature Studies
关键词 中文生前预嘱 语类 生产 使用 观念变化 Chinese living will production use perception change
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献56

  • 1包丽虹.汉语死亡委婉语之文化成因探[J].内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,32(S1):77-80. 被引量:12
  • 2孙汝建.委婉的社会心理分析[J].当代修辞学,1996(5):17-18. 被引量:11
  • 3田贵森.从社会语言学角度看中外禁忌语与避讳语[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1989,12(2):108-112. 被引量:9
  • 4李思国,姜焱.英汉“死亡”代用语跨文化对比分析[J].外语与外语教学,2001(11):52-54. 被引量:32
  • 5黎昌抱,吴锋针.英汉“死亡”委婉语对比研究[J].西安外国语学院学报,2005,13(1):16-19. 被引量:26
  • 6A1-Ali, M. 2005. Communicating Messages of Solidarity, Promotion and Pride in Death Announcements Genre in Jordanian Newspapers[J]. Discourse and Society, 16(1): 5-31,.
  • 7Allan, K. & K. Burridge.1991. Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language Used As Shield and Weapon[M]. New York: Oxford University Press. Anderson, W., S. Kools & A. Lyndon. 2013.
  • 8Dancing around Death: Hospitalist-patient Communication about Serious Illness[J]. Qualitative Health Research, 23(1): 3-13.
  • 9Askildson, L. 2007. Discourse and Generic Features of US Army Obituaries: A Mini-corpus Analysis of Contemporary Military Death Announcements[J]. Language, Meaning and Society, (1): 108-121.
  • 10Ayodeji, O. 2013. Christians' Perception of the Concepts of Death and Judgment: A Multimodal Discourse Analytical Study of Selected Editions of Christian Women Mirror Magazine International[J]. Journal of English and Literature, (10): 508-515.

共引文献26

同被引文献103

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部