期刊文献+

基于情感分析和证据理论的多属性在线评论决策方法 被引量:13

Multi-Attribute Online Review Decision Making Method Based on Sentiment Analysis and Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,大量的有关产品或服务的在线评论信息在众多网站涌现,如何基于在线评论进行决策分析是一个值得关注的研究问题。提出了一种基于情感分析和证据理论的多属性在线评论决策方法,在该方法中,首先针对决策者关注的备选方案及属性采集相应的在线评论;然后针对采集的多属性在线评论进行情感分析并得到在线评论针对各属性在不同情感强度等级上出现的频次;进一步,依据证据理论,将在线评论在不同情感强度等级上出现的频次转化为针对不同情感强度等级的信任度,并依据证据合成规则将备选方案各属性的信任度集结为综合信任度;在此基础上,通过计算所有备选方案的效用值,进而得到方案的排序结果用于决策者购买决策;最后,以基于汽车之家网站的在线评论信息进行汽车购买决策为例说明了该方法的可行性和有效性。 In recent years, a large amount of online review information on products or services emerges on many websites. Therefore, it is worthwhile to make decision analysis based on online. A method for multi-attribute online review decision was proposed based on the sentiment analysis and evidence theory. First, online reviews with respect to each attribute of alternatives concerned by decision maker were collected. Then, the different emotional intensity level frequency of online reviews collected with respect to each attribute was obtained using the sentiment analysis. After that, according to the evidence theory, the different emotional intensity level frequency of online reviews was transformed into a degree of belief which was assigned to the different emotional intensity levels. According to the evidence synthesis rules, the comprehensive degree of belief was obtained by integrating the degree of belief with respect to each attribute of alternatives, based on which, the overall utility value of each alternative was calculated, and the ranking result of all alternatives were determined. Finally, a car purchase example based on the online review information from https://www.autohome.com.cn was used to illustrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method.
作者 尤天慧 张瑾 樊治平 YOU Tianhui;ZHANG Jin;FAN Zhiping(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110167,China)
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期536-544,共9页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271049,71571039) 中央高校基本科研业务经费资助项目(N140607001)
关键词 多属性在线评论决策 情感分析 证据理论 方案排序 multi-attribute online review decision making sentiment analysis evidence theory alternative ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1王应明,傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策,1993,8(1):25-29. 被引量:70
  • 2严鸿和,陈玉祥,许昭明,杨皖苏.专家评分机理与最优综合评价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(2):19-23. 被引量:77
  • 3朱嫣岚,闵锦,周雅倩,黄萱菁,吴立德.基于HowNet的词汇语义倾向计算[J].中文信息学报,2006,20(1):14-20. 被引量:326
  • 4路斌,万小军,杨建武,等.基于同义词词林的词汇褒贬计算[C]//中国计算技术与语言问题研究-第七届中文信息处理国际会议论文集.北京:电子工业出版社,2007:17-23.
  • 5姚天昉,娄德成.汉语语句主题语义倾向分析方法的研究[J].中文信息学报,2007,21(5):73-79. 被引量:78
  • 6Kamps J, Marx M,Mokken R J, et al. UsingWordNet to measure semantic orientation ofadjectives[C]// Proceedings of the 4,h InternationalConference on Language Resources and Evaluation,Lisbon. PT : European Language ResourcesAssociation. 2004 (IV): 1115-1118.
  • 7Ku L W, Liang Y T,Chen H H. Opinion extraction,summarization and tracking in news and blog corpora[C]// Nicolas Nicolov,Franco Salvetti, Mark Liberman,and James H. Martin (Eds. ). AAAI Symposium onComputational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs(AAAI-CAAW), Menlo Park, California, USA: AAAIPress, 2006 : 100-107.
  • 8Kim S M, Hovy E. Determining the sentiment ofopinions [C]//Proceedings of the 2011l InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),Stroudsburg, PA, USA : Association forComputational Linguistics, 2004 : 1367-1373.
  • 9Lin W H, Wilson T,Wiebe J,etal. Which side areyou on. identifying perspectives at the document andsentence levels [C]//Proc. of the 10th Conf. onComputational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X),NY, USA: 2006: 109-116.
  • 10Wilson T,Wiebe J,Hwa R. J ust how mad are you.finding strong and weak opinion clauses [C]//Proceedings of the 19th National Conference onArtifical Intelligence, USA: AAAI Press, 2004 :761-769.

共引文献239

同被引文献154

引证文献13

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部