期刊文献+

叉头框转录因子O1和Kruppel样转录因子9在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及其临床意义 被引量:2

Expressions of forkhead transcription factor O1 and Kruppel like transcription factor 9 in non-small cell lung cancer and their clinical significances
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)组织中叉头框转录因子O1(FOXO1)与Kruppel样转录因子9(KLF9)的表达及其临床意义。方法收集2012年9月至2015年6月榆林市第一医院手术切除的102例NSCLC肿瘤组织标本,另选取距癌组织边缘≥5 cm的癌旁组织作为对照组。采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)检测NSCLC组织及癌旁组织中FOXO1与KLF9 mRNA相对表达量,免疫组织化学法检测NSCLC组织及癌旁组织中FOXO1、KLF9蛋白表达。根据癌组织mRNA检测结果的均值将FOXO1、KLF9分为高表达组与低表达组,分析二者与患者临床病理参数的关系。采用Pearson法对FOXO1、KLF9的表达进行相关性分析,采用Kaplan-Meier法对患者生存情况进行分析,对影响NSCLC预后的相关因素进行logistic回归分析。结果与癌旁组织相比,NSCLC组织FOXO1 mRNA相对表达量升高(2.82±0.15比1.28±0.47,t=31.525,P<0.05),KLF9 mRNA相对表达量降低(0.34±0.07比1.04±0.11,t=54.222,P<0.05)。FOXO1在有淋巴结转移、分化程度高、TNM分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者癌组织中的表达水平较高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);KLF9在有淋巴结转移、分化程度高、TNM分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者癌组织中的表达水平较低,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析法显示FOXO1与KLF9表达无相关性(r=0.154,P=0.156)。Kaplan-Meier法分析结果显示FOXO1高表达组3年总生存率低于FOXO1低表达组(10.81%比60.71%,χ^2=27.341,P<0.01),KLF9低表达组3年总生存率低于KLF9高表达组(26.32%比61.54%,χ^2=8.526,P=0.003)。logistic回归分析结果显示FOXO1高表达是影响NSCLC预后的危险因素(OR=2.682,P=0.003),KLF9高表达是NSCLC预后的保护因素(OR=0.446,P=0.012)。结论NSCLC组织中FOXO1高表达与KLF9低表达可作为预测NSCLC进展情况的有效指标,二者均与患者预后不良密切相关。 Objective To investigate the expressions of forkhead transcription factor O1 (FOXO1) and Kruppel like transcription factor 9 (KLF9) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their clinical significances. Methods A total of 102 patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection in the First Hospital of Yulin from September 2012 to June 2015 were selected as NSCLC group, and the paracancerous tissues more than 5 cm far from the edge of the cancer tissues were selected as the control group. The relative expressions of FOXO1 and KLF9 mRNA in NSCLC tissues and paracancerous tissues were detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and the immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expressions of FOXO1 and KLF9 in NSCLC tissues and paracancerous tissues. According to the mean mRNA expression in NSCLC tissues, FOXO1 and KLF9 were divided into high expression group and low expression group, their relationships with clinicopathological parameters were observed. The correlation of FOXO1 and KLF9 expressions was analyzed by Pearson method, and the survival of patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, logistic regression analysis was performed on the related factors affecting the prognosis of NSCLC. Results Compared with the control group, the expression level of FOXO1 in NSCLC group increased (1.28±0.47 vs. 2.82±0.15, t= 31.525, P < 0.05), while the expression level of KLF9 decreased (1.04±0.11 vs. 0.34±0.07, t= 54.222, P < 0.05). The expressions of FOXO1 were lower in NSCLC tissues of patients with lymph node metastasis, high differentiation, and TNM stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ than those in NSCLC tissues of patients without lymph node metastasis, middle and low differentiation, and TNM stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The expressions of KLF9 were higher in NSCLC tissues of patients with lymph node metastasis, high differentiation, and TNM stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ than those in NSCLC tissues of patients without lymph node metastasis, middle and low differentiation and TNM stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between FOXO1 and KLF9 expression (r= 0.154, P= 0.156). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 3-year overall survival rate of FOXO1 high expression group was lower than that of FOXO1 low expression group (10.81% vs. 60.71%,χ^2= 27.341, P < 0.01). The 3-year overall survival rate of KLF9 low expression group was lower than that of KLF9 high expression group (26.32% vs. 61.54%,χ^2= 8.526, P= 0.003). Logistic regression analysis showed that FOXO1 was a risk factor for the prognosis of NSCLC (OR= 2.682, P= 0.003), and KLF9 was a protective factor for the prognosis of NSCLC (OR= 0.446, P= 0.012). Conclusions The high expression of FOXO1 and the low expression of KLF9 in NSCLC tissues can be used as effective indexes to predict the progression of NSCLC. The expressions of FOXO1 and KLF9 are closely related to the poor prognosis of patients.
作者 郝登荣 李小峰 彭彦才 Hao Dengrong;Li Xiaofeng;Peng Yancai(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin 718000, China)
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2019年第5期305-309,共5页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 非小细胞肺 叉头框转录因子类 Kruppel样转录因子9 Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung Forkhead transcription factors Kruppel like transcription factor 9
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈克能,顾振东.新辅助化疗后支气管成形肺叶切除术治疗肺癌[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(7):468-469. 被引量:4
  • 2陈万青,张思维,李连弟,鲁凤珠,赵平,邹小农,陈永红.中国部分市县1998~2002年肺癌的发病与死亡[J].中国肿瘤,2006,15(9):570-574. 被引量:99
  • 3康玲,来茂德.BTEB/KLF9与基因转录调控[J].遗传,2007,29(5):515-522. 被引量:5
  • 4李连弟,鲁凤珠,张思维,牧人,孙秀娣,皇甫小梅,孙杰,周有尚,欧阳宁慧,饶克勤,陈育德,孙爱明,薛志福,夏毅.中国恶性肿瘤死亡率20年变化趋势和近期预测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1997,19(1):3-9. 被引量:869
  • 5Graham EA Singer JJ. Successful removal of an entire lung[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,1933,(18):1371-1374.
  • 6Kates M,Swanson S,Wisnivesky JP. Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer《=1cm in size:a review of SEER data[J].Chest,2011,(03):491-496.
  • 7Nakamura H,Taniguchi Y,Miwa K. Comparison of the surgical outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy,segmentectomy,and wedge resection for clinical stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer[J].Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon,2011,(03):137-141.
  • 8Martin J,Ginsberg RJ,Abolhoda A. Morbidity andmortality after neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer:the risks of right pneumonectomy[J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2001,(04):1149-1154.
  • 9Archibald E. The technic of total unilateral pneumonectomy[J].Annals of Surgery,1934,(04):796-811.
  • 10Churchill ED. Lobectomy and pneumonectomy in bronchiectasis of cystic disease[J].Journal of Vascular Surgery,1937.286-311.

共引文献25

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部