期刊文献+

基于Hurst指数的脑胶质瘤分级方法 被引量:2

Grading method of gliomas based on Hurst index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于复杂度分析对胶质瘤患者的磁共振大脑静息态数据进行描述,寻找基于复杂度分析的肿瘤分级的客观指标。方法基于复杂度赫斯特(Hurst)指数分析方法对被试者大脑肿瘤fMRI影像的功能信息进行提取和分析,并对肿瘤进行分级研究。首先基于MRIcro软件对患者肿瘤区域、对侧正常区域以及正常对照组的肿瘤对应区域进行提取;接着对提取出来的区域进行Hurst指数计算;然后对肿瘤区域及其对侧正常区域的Hurst指数值进行统计分析,对肿瘤区域及对照组同区域的Hurst指数值进行统计分析;最后将29例肿瘤患者样本按照病理等级进行分组,其中一级肿瘤患者10例,二级肿瘤患者7例,三、四级肿瘤患者各6例,对不同组别的Hurst指数进行双样本统计分析。结果被试肿瘤区域的Hurst指数值与肿瘤等级成正比关系,肿瘤等级越高Hurst指数值越大。统计分析表明不同级别肿瘤区域的Hurst指数差异具有统计学意义。低级别肿瘤Hurst指数范围为0.6381~0.6737,高级别肿瘤Hurst指数范围为0.7514~0.8194。结论Hurst指数分析方法可以区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤,可以为更细致的胶质瘤的等级划分提供帮助。 Objective To describe the MRI brain rest data of glioma patients based on complexity analysis,and to find objective indicators of tumor grading based on complexity analysis. Methods Based on the complexity of the Hurst index analysis method,the functional information of fMRI images of brain tumors was extracted and analyzed,and the tumors were graded. Firstly,based on the MRIcro software,the corresponding regions of the tumor in the patient’s tumor region,contralateral normal region,and normal control group were extracted;then the Hurst index was calculated for the extracted region;then the Hurst index value of the tumor region and its contralateral normal region was performed. Statistical analysis was performed on the Hurst index values in the same region of the tumor region and the control group. Finally,29 tumor patients were grouped according to pathological grade,including 10 primary tumor patients,7 secondary tumor patients,6 third- and fourth-grade tumor patients,and two-sample statistical analysis was performed on the Hurst index of different groups. Results The Hurst index value of the tumor region was proportional to the tumor grade. The higher the tumor grade was,the higher the Hurst index value was. The statistical analysis showed that the Hurst index of the tumor areas at different levels was significantly different. The Hurst index ranged from 0.638 1 to 0.673 7 in low-grade tumors,and from 0.751 4 to 0.819 4 in high-grade tumors. Conclusions The Hurst index analysis method can distinguish between low-grade and high-grade gliomas,and can provide help for more detailed classification of gliomas.
作者 杨宇轩 陶玲 钱志余 YANG Yuxuan;TAO Ling;QIAN Zhiyu(College of Automation Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106)
出处 《北京生物医学工程》 2019年第3期271-276,共6页 Beijing Biomedical Engineering
基金 南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地(实验室)开放基金(kfjj20170324)资助
关键词 脑胶质瘤 肿瘤分级 复杂度 赫斯特指数 gliomas tumor grading complexity Hurst
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献82

  • 1江涛,马文兵,杨学军.脑胶质瘤治疗技术与进展[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 2Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologie grade of cerebral gliomas : preliminary results[J].AJ R, 2002,179 (3) : 783-789.
  • 3Franiel T, Hamm B, Hricak H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mag- netic resonance imaging and pharmaeokinetic models in prostate cancer[J]. Eur Radiol,2011,21(3) :616-626.
  • 4Kim J H, Lee J M, Park J H, et al. Solid pancreatic lesions : charac terization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging assessment a preliminary study[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(1) :185-196.
  • 5de Langen AJ, van den Boogaart V, Lubberink M, et al. Monito- ring response to antiangiogenic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer using imaging markers derived from PET and dynamic con trast-enhanced MRI[J]. J Nucl Med, 2011,52 ( 1 ) : 48- 55.
  • 6Patankar TF, Haroon HA, Mills SJ, et al. Is volume transfer coef- ficient (Ktrans) related to histologic grade in human gliomas[J]. AJNR,2005,26(10) :2455-2465.
  • 7Mills SJ,Patankar TA, Haroon HA,et al. Do cerebral blood vol- ume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma[J]. AJNR,2006,27(4) :853-858.
  • 8Zhang N,Zhang L, Qiu B, et al. Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,36(2) :355-363.
  • 9Yankeelov TE, DeBusk LM, Billheimer DD, el al. Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MR1 data at 7T[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24(5) :1140-1147.
  • 10Yankeelov TE, Cron GO, Addison CL, et al. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an A1F in the analysis of DCE-MRI data[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2007,57 (2) : 353-361.

共引文献40

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部