期刊文献+

基于贝叶斯网络的试飞风险评估方法研究 被引量:10

Researchon Risk Assessment Method of Flight Test Basedon Bayesian Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了基于故障树的贝叶斯网络的风险评估模型;综合运用正向推理与反向推理方法,实现了对试飞风险的分析;结合湾流宇航公司G650公务机试飞事故的实例开展风险概率的计算,并借助贝叶斯建模软件GENIE实现图形化描述,找出了试飞风险的关键致因为人的因素与湾流宇航公司的管理因素,与采用传统故障树分析法得到的结论相同,从而验证了贝叶斯方法的可靠性,最后提出了改进措施来减少试飞科目的风险,提高试飞安全性。 Bayesian network risk assessment model based on fault tree was established based on the system engineering theory of“man-machine-management-environment”.By using forward reasoning and backward reasoning methods,the risk of flight test was analyzed.Combining with the example of G650 civil aircraft flight test accident of Gulfstream Aerospace Company,this paper calculated the risk probability,and realized the graphical description with the help of GENIE,a Bayesian modelling software.It finds out that the key causes of flight test risk are human factors and management factors of Gulfstream Aerospace Company.The conclusion is the same as that obtained by traditional fault tree analysis method.The reliability of Bayesian method was verified.Finally,some improvement measures were put forward to reduce the risk of flight test subjects and improve the safety of flight test.
作者 张鑫 孙有朝 ZHANG Xin;SUN Youchao(College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China)
出处 《兵器装备工程学报》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第5期70-74,共5页 Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空局联合资助项目(U1333119) 国防基础科研计划项目(JCKY2013605B002) 国防科工局技术基础科研项目(Z052013B003)
关键词 试飞风险 故障树 贝叶斯网络 GENIE flighttestrisk faulttree Bayesian network GENIE
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘勃,周荷琴.基于贝叶斯网络的网络安全评估方法研究[J].计算机工程,2004,30(22):111-113. 被引量:15
  • 2王华伟,左洪福.航空公司安全评估研究[J].系统工程,2006,24(2):46-51. 被引量:30
  • 3周忠宝.基于贝叶斯网络的概率安全评估方法及应用研究.长沙:国防科技大学,2006:22-23.
  • 4Greenberg R, Cook S C, Harris D. A civil aviation safety assessment model using a Bayesian belief network (BBN). The Aeronautical Journal, 2005, 109(1101) : 557- 568.
  • 5McFadden K L, Towell E R. Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium. Journal of Air Trans- port Management, 1999(5): 177-184.
  • 6Ruan D, Huang C F. Fuzzy sets and operations research for decision support (advances in fuzzy mathematics and engineering ). Beijing : Beijing Normal University Press,2009.
  • 7许家武.海运公司安全管理的FSA(综合安全评估)研究.上海:上海海事大学,2004:40-43,48-53.
  • 8Vidal L A, Marle F, Bocquet J C. Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applica- tions, 2011, 38(5): 5388-5405.
  • 9Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: net- works of plausible inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. , 1988.
  • 10Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(8): 925-932.

共引文献49

同被引文献100

引证文献10

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部