期刊文献+

心理干预研究的伦理问题与应对 被引量:3

Ethical Concerns and Countermeasures on Research of Psychological Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 相关伦理规范从受试者权益保障出发,强调了对心理干预研究的伦理审查要求。由于心理干预的特性,在研究过程中还存在一些特殊伦理问题,主要包括:风险识别的困难,研究者易于忽略心理风险;风险管理不充分,缺乏完备的保护措施;知情同意中使用隐瞒或欺骗,需要充分评估其合理性与潜在伤害性,并事后说明;心理学者缺乏充分的研究伦理认知,成果发表缺乏伦理审查批件要求等。为了加强在心理干预研究中对受试者权益的保护,建议应加强风险识别与管理、增加伦理审查的专业性与成果发表的伦理门槛、加强伦理教育等。 In the view of protecting the rights and interests of subjects,relevant ethical codes emphasize the requirement of ethical review on research of psychological intervention.Due to the characteristics of psychological intervention,there are some special ethical concerns involving the research,including:the difficulty of risk identification,researchers'ignorance of psychological risks;inadequate risk management,and lack of complete protective measures;the use of concealment or deception in informed consent,requiring full assessment of rationality and potential harm,and lack of sufficient explanation afterwards;psychologists'lack of sufficient awareness of research ethics,absence of requirement on ethical review approval for publication of research results,and so on.In order to improve the protection of subjects'rights and interests in the research of psychological intervention,it is suggested that risk identification and management should be strengthened,the professionalism of ethical review and the ethical threshold of publication of results should be increased,and ethical education should be strengthened.
作者 叶丽频 陈旻 YE Li-pin;CHEN Min(School of Humanities,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350122,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 2019年第10期28-31,共4页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2016年福建省教育厅高等学校创新创业教育改革项目(闽教高[2016]27号)
关键词 心理干预 研究伦理 风险识别 受试者保护 psychological intervention research ethics risk identification subject protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1马立骥.心理评估技术在社区心理咨询中的应用[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(11):873-876. 被引量:6
  • 2汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:心理卫生杂志社,1999.
  • 3中国心理学会临床与咨询心理学工作伦理守则(第一版)[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):947-950. 被引量:88
  • 4Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52(4) : 664-678.
  • 5Melanie C. What Underlies Security? Neurological Evidence for Attachment's Resource Enhancement Role[D]. Kansas City; Uni- versity of Kansas. Doctoral Dissertation, 2011.
  • 6Maslow A H, Hirsh E, Stein M, Honigmann I. A Clinically Derived Test for Measuring Psychological Seeurity-insecurity[J]. Jour- nal of General Psychology, 1945, 33(1): 21-41.
  • 7Young R, Lennie S, Minnis H. Children's Perceptions of Parental Emotional Neglect and Control and Psychopathology[J]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2011, 52(8) : 889-897.
  • 8Mikulincer M, Shaver P R, Rom E. The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Security Priming on Creative Problem Solving[J]. Cogni- tion & Emotion, 2011,25(3) ; 519-531.
  • 9Van Ryzin M J, Leve L D. Validity Evidence for the Security Scale as a Measure of Perceived Attachment Security in Adolescence [J]. Journal of Adolescence, 2012, 35(2): 425-431.
  • 10Tucker L R, Lewis C. A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis[J]. Psychometrika, 1973,38(1) ..1-10.

共引文献96

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部