期刊文献+

精神障碍患者非自愿住院程序问题研究 被引量:5

Study on Involuntary Hospitalization Procedure of Mental Disorder Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国立法与实践中在精神障碍患者非自愿住院程序方面存在诸多问题,包括精神障碍诊断的主观性与滥用问题、“危险性”诊断标准较为抽象与缺乏“可治疗性”诊断标准、非自愿住院的决定主体不适格问题。这些问题严重损害了精神障碍患者的合法权益。针对上述问题,应当对“危险性”标准进行界定,确立合理的标准;增加“可治疗性”要件作为非自愿住院诊断标准,以实现治疗精神障碍的根本目的;建立针对非自愿住院治疗的司法审查或独立第三方机构审查模式,防止精神障碍诊断的滥用,确保公平和程序正义。 There are many problems in the involuntary hospitalization procedure of mental disorder patients in our legislation and practice,which includes the subjectivity and abuse of the diagnosis of mental disorders,the abstraction of the diagnostic criteria of"dangerous"and the lack of diagnostic criteria of"therapeutic",and the unqualified decision-maker of involuntary hospitalization.These problems have seriously damaged the legitimate rights and interests of patients with mental disorders.In response to the above problems,the"dangerous"criteria should be defined to establish reasonable standards;the"therapeutic"requirements should be added as the involuntary inpatient diagnostic criteria to achieve the fundamental purpose of treating mental disorders;a judicial review or independent third-party review model for involuntary hospitalization should be established to prevent the abuse of mental disorder diagnosis and ensure fairness and procedural justice.
作者 谷曼 崔玉明 GU Man;CUI Yu-ming(College of Humanities and Law,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 2019年第10期65-69,共5页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2015年河北省社会科学基金项目(HB15FX010)
关键词 精神障碍患者 非自愿住院 决定主体 mental disorder patient involuntary hospitalization decision maker
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1http ://media. news. sohu. eom/64/12/news147161264, shtml.
  • 21954年8月26日《中华人民共和国劳动改造条例》第37条第1款第1项规定.
  • 3Brian J. Pollock, Kansas v. Hendricks: A Workable Standard for "Mental Illness" or A Push Down the Slippery Slope toward Abuse of Civil Commitment?, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 319.
  • 4O' Conner v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563(1975).
  • 5involuntary commitment条目,http://en.wikipedia.org/wikifinvoluntary_commitment.
  • 6ORS 426. 510.
  • 7ORS 426.650.
  • 8ORS 426. 670.
  • 9ORS426.675.
  • 10美国联邦最高法院Kansasv.Hendncks案,117S.Ct.2072.

共引文献54

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部