期刊文献+

回肠造口还纳术后切口感染危险因素分析及皮下负压引流球的应用 被引量:5

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative incision infection in ileostomy closure technique and the application of subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析回肠造口还纳术后切口感染的危险因素,并探讨切口留置皮下负压引流球防治切口感染的效果。方法回顾性分析2013年2月~2017年5月在我院行回肠造口还纳术的283例患者资料,对有可能影响切口感染的临床病理因素进行单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析。比较切口留置皮下负压引流球组患者与无留置皮下负压引流球组患者在切口感染率、甲级愈合率、换药次数和住院时间的差异。结果术后共26例(9.2%)患者出现切口感染。单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析显示:BMI≥25kg/m^2、合并糖尿病、手术时间≥100min是回肠造口还纳术后切口感染的独立危险因素,而切口留置皮下负压引流球是术后切口感染的独立保护性因素(P均<0.05)。切口留置皮下引流球组患者较无留置皮下负压引流球组患者切口感染率低(3.9%vs13.5%)、切口甲级愈合率高(90.6%vs61.5%)、平均换药次数少[(3.6±0.7)次vs(7.0±1.5)次]、平均住院时间短[(7.7±2.1)dvs(12.3±3.6)d],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论BMI≥25kg/m2、合并糖尿病、手术时间≥100min是回肠造口还纳术后切口感染的独立危险因素。切口留置皮下负压引流球是防治回肠造口还纳术后切口感染的有效方法。 Objective To analyze the risk factors of incision infection after ileostomy closure technique and to investigate the effect of incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball on prevention of wound infection.Methods A total of 283 patients who underwent ileostomy closure technique in our hospital from February 2013 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on clinicopathological factors that may affect wound infection.The differences in incision infection rate,grade A healing rate,dressing frequency and length of hospital stay were compared between patients with incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball and those without incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball.Results A total of 26 patients(9.2%)developed incision infection after sugery.Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BMI≥25 kg/m2,the combination of diabetes mellitus,and operation time≥100 min were independent risk factors for incision infection after ileostomy closure technique.While incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball was postoperative independent protective factors for wound infection(P all<0.05).Patients with incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball had lower incision infection rate(3.9%vs 13.5%),higher grade A healing rate of incision(90.6%vs 61.5%),and fewer average dressing changes[(3.6±0.7)times vs(7.0±1.5)times]than those without incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball,shorter average hospital stay[(7.7±2.1)d vs(12.3±3.6)d],and the difference was statistically significant(P all<0.05).Conclusion BMI≥25 kg/m^2,the combination of diabetes mellitus,and operation time≥100 min are independent risk factors for incisional infection after ileostomy closure technique.Incision indwelling subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball is an effective means to prevent incision infection after ileostomy closure technique.
作者 陈鸿源 陈黎奇 夏浩沄 池良杰 薛芳沁 黄良祥 CHEN Hongyuan;CHEN Liqi;XIA Haoyun;CHI Liangjie;XUE Fangqin;HUANG Liangxiang(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Fujian Provincial Hospital,Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical Medical College,Fuzhou 350001,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2019年第14期81-84,88,共5页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 回肠造口还纳术 切口感染 危险因素 皮下负压引流球 低位直肠癌 Ileostomy closure technique Incision infection Risk factors Subcutaneous negative pressure drainage ball Low rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1李东华,黄梁,陈伟国,林谋斌.直肠癌超低位前切除术中辅助性回肠造口的临床价值探讨[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(2):97-99. 被引量:28
  • 2王锡山.直肠癌保肛系列问题探讨[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2006,20(6):480-483. 被引量:21
  • 3Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, et al. Intraoperative air testing of coloreetal anastomoses: A prospective, randomized trial[J]. Br J Surg, 1990,77(10) :1095-1097.
  • 4Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, et al. Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: A nationwide cohort study[J]. Ann Surg, 2014,259(5):930-938.
  • 5Basilico V, Griffa B, Radaelli F, et al. Anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection for cancer: How to define, manage and treat it [ J ]. Minerva Chir, 2014,69 (5) : 245 -252.
  • 6Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G, et al. The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection[J]. World J Surg, 2015,39 (4) : 1052-1058. DOI : 10.1007/s00268-014- 2887-2.
  • 7Mezhir J], Shia J, Riedel E, et al. Whole-mount pathologic analysis of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: Implications of margin status on long-term oncologic outcome [J]. Ann Surg, 2012,256 (2):274-279. DOI:10.1097/SLA. 0b013e31825c13d5.
  • 8Hakkarainen TW, Steele SR, Bastaworous A, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for anastomotic failure: A report from washington state's surgical care and outcomes assessment program (scoap) [ J ]. JAMA Surg, 2015,150 (3) : 223-228. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2239.
  • 9Johnson LB, Jorgensen LN, Adawi D, et al. The effect of preoperative radiotherapy on systemic collagen deposition and postoperative infective complications in rectal cancer patients [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005,48(8) : 1573-1580.
  • 10Wong NY, Eu KW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48 ( 11 ) : 2076-2079.

共引文献54

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部