期刊文献+

腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤的疗效分析 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤患者的疗效及安全性。方法:选取巨大子宫肌瘤患者113例,依据术式不同分组,对照组56例采取开腹术治疗,研究组57例采取腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术治疗,对比两组术中情况、住院用时及并发症发生率,比较两组术前、末次随访生活质量(WHOQOL-100)评分。结果:研究组术中各项指标均优于对照组;研究组并发症总发生率低于对照组;研究组末次随访WHOQOL-100评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论:巨大子宫肌瘤患者采取腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术治疗,能显著减少术中失血量,缩短术后排气时间、下地活动时间及住院用时,减少并发症,提升其生活质量。
作者 周莉
机构地区 长葛市人民医院
出处 《山西职工医学院学报》 CAS 2019年第2期63-65,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Medical College for Continuing Education
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献53

  • 1张丽君,涂长玉,杨志永,童晓文,刘艳,张峰,肖永霞,宋维花,孔北华.腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗子宫腺肌病的研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(16):4858-4861. 被引量:10
  • 2吴连方,刘妍,阮焱.卡前列素防治高危产妇剖宫产术中及术后出血的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(9):577-581. 被引量:106
  • 3Shetty J, Shanbhag A, Pandey D, et al. Converting potential abdominal hysterectomy to vaginal one: laparoscopie assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Minim Invasive Surg, 2014, 14(2): 614-615.
  • 4Kim EG, Park H J, Kang H, et al. Antiemetic effect of propofol administered at the end of surgery in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2014, 66(3): 210-215.
  • 5Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, et al. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 15 (14): 142-144.
  • 6Fulcher PH Jr, Granese M, Churl Y, et al. Intraoperative utilization of dexamethasone/bupivacaine/gentamicin solution in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and pain management [J]. W V Med J, 2014, 110(1): 10-15.
  • 7Kim T J, Song T, Choi CH, et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hystere- ctomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(4):254-259.
  • 8Minaglia S. Vaginal trachelectomy following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy [J].Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2014, 20(2): 116-118.
  • 9Yang YS, Kim SY, Hur MH, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (NAVH vs. SP-LAVH): A case-matched study [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(14): 35-41.
  • 10Dayaratna S,Goldberg J,Harrington C, et al. Hospital costs of total vagiaal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(2): 11-16.

共引文献166

同被引文献33

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部