期刊文献+

Evolutional AtHtude Based on Option Prioritization for Conflict Analysis of Urban Transport Planning in Pakistan

原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper constructs a dynamic conflict model that considers Decision Makers'(DMs)evolutional attitude using the option prioritization.The proposed evolutional attitude approach is based on the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution(GMCR).Compared with the existing state-based preference,the option prioritization is a more convenient and efficient approach to analyze larger models with consideration of the evolutional attitude,which exists broadly in the evolutional conflicts in reallife.This study reveals how the evolutional attitude of a DM succeeds in the overall evolution of conflict.The analysis unfolds that DMs change their attitude(s)consequent upon the changes in DMs and options available to them as conflict evolves from one level to the next.The changes in attitude of DMs during dynamic conflict situation have substantial effects on the equilibrium outcomes of a conflict.The proposed evaluation attitude-based approach is employed to analyze the conflict between the Punjab Government(G)and Heritage Campaigner and the Public(P)in Pakistan that appeared due to the inappropriate design,planning,and construction of an urban transport system project in Lahore,Pakistan.The present study demonstrates the modeling procedure of a two-level evolutional attitude-based conflict analysis.The results of the stability analysis reveal that improper(negative)attitude may result in undesirable and unexpected consequences,such as project temporalities and delays.This research provides a foundation for future research in urban project planning that employs strategic ways to avoid disputes caused by DMs'attitudes.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2019年第3期356-381,共26页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71471087,71071076,and 61673209).
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Takehiro INOHARA,Keith W. HIPEL,Sean WALKER.CONFLICT ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR INVESTIGATING ATTITUDES AND MISPERCEPTIONS IN THE WAR OF 1812[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2007,16(2):181-201. 被引量:29
  • 2[14]Li,K.W.,Hipel,K.W.,Kilgour,D.L.& Fang,L.(2004).Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution.IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics Part A,34 (4):507-520
  • 3[15]Libraries and Archives Canada,(2002).Introduction-War of 1812-From colony to country:A reader's guide to Canadian military history.In:Collections Canada.Available via http://www.collectionscanada.ca/military/h1 3-5001-e.html.Cited January 4,2006
  • 4[16]Obeidi,A.,Hipel,K.W.& Kilgour,D.M.(2005).The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis.Group Decision and Negotiation,14 (6):481-500
  • 5[17]Nash,J.F.,(1950).Equilibrium points in n-player games.Proceedings National Academy of Sciences,36:48-49
  • 6[18]Nash,J.F.(1951).Non-cooperative games.Annals of Mathematics,54 (2):286-295
  • 7[19]Patterson,B.R.(2005).The Generals:Andrew Jackson,Sir Edward Packenham and the Road to the Battle of New Orleans.New York University Press,New York
  • 8[20]Perkins,B.(1961) Prologue to War;England and the United States.University of California Press,Los Angeles
  • 9[21]Sears,L.M.(1927).Jefferson and the Embargo.Octagon Books,New York City.
  • 10[22]US Army,(2001).Chapter 6,the War of 1812.In:American Military History.Available via:http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/amh/am h-06.htm.Cited September 23,2005

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部